Trump: Transgenders can use any bathroom

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Ted Cruz putting the issue in terms that even Trump supporters can understand.

"If Donald Trump dresses up as Hillary Clinton, he still can't go to the girl's bathroom."

https://amp.twimg.com/v/b14ad5fb-ae3...5-a654d2fd5b74

Shrillary RottenHam Klingon does not need to dress up, she can go to the boy's bathroom and no one would bat an eye.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Shrillary RottenHam Klingon does not need to dress up, she can go to the boy's bathroom and no one would bat an eye.

So, all of you Christians - I have a question? I would like to know if you and all those pastors who have endorsed Donald Trump are planning to implement that same bathroom policy in their church? Yes or No?

[Originalist]

Another silly post. All of us support the sovereign State of North Carolina in their struggle against the tyranny of Federal Courts,as does Trump. The difference between you and us is you would not stand up for a State's right to have gender neutral bathrooms if a Federal court ruled they could not.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

The difference between you and us is you would not stand up for a State's right to have gender neutral bathrooms if a Federal court ruled they could not.

What in the utter nonsense... That is the most asinine statement I believe I have ever read.

Absolutely, yes. If a State wanted to allow a male pervert to follow my daughters into a woman's bathroom....I would absolutely be against it. States rights be damned.

The difference between us is I'm not going to put my daughters in harm's way. You, on the other hand, have no problem with putting your daughter (if you have one) in a situation where she could be assaulted or raped.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

What in the utter nonsense... That is the most asinine statement I believe I have ever read.

Absolutely, yes. If a State wanted to allow a male pervert to follow my daughters into a woman's bathroom....I would absolutely be against it. States rights be damned.

The difference between us is I'm not going to put my daughters in harm's way. You, on the other hand, welcome it.

So you admit that you do not care about the constitution and want a President who would use unconstitutional power to force a State to comply with your wishes in the name of "protecting your daughter". I'd be against any State allowing a pervert to follow your daughter into the bathroom. I'd also be against the Federal Government butting in in the name of "protecting the children".

States' rights be damned

That says it all and the Federal Courts agree with you and are thus using unconstitutional powers to force your daughter to pee with perverts.

[n david]

I have three daughters: twin one year olds and a seven year old. No way will I allow federal or state law tell me I have to let a perverted man follow my daughters into the woman's bathroom.

As JA says, not on the coldest day in hell.

That isn't a states rights issue for me.

It's common sense as the father of three girls and husband to my wife.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

So you admit that you do not care about the constitution and want a President who would use unconstitutional power to force a State to comply with your wishes in the name of "protecting your daughter". I'd be against any State allowing a pervert to follow your daughter into the bathroom. i'd also be against the Federal Government butting in in the name of "protecting the children".

That says it all and the Federal Courts agree with you and are thus using unconstitutional powers to force your daughter to pee with perverts.

I'm not going to respond to this stupid post.

"So you admit you don't care about the Constitution..."

Get out of here with that junk, man.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

I'd be against any State allowing a pervert to follow your daughter into the bathroom.

No you wouldn't! You just posted you would support the state in its demand to allow it. And you support Trump's stance, which is against NC for passing a law about it.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

I'm not going to respond to this stupid post.

"So you admit you don't care about the Constitution..."

Get out of here with that junk, man.

States' right be damned

YOUR words, not Trump's. At least Trump,while thinking North Carolina made a mistake, supports their right to pass the law. YOU want a Federal dictatorship to force your views on the whole nation. You are not a constitutionalist at all. You are a "big government conservative". You don't get that it is the ignoring of States' rights that has led us to where we are now, and you want MORE Federal overreach as long as they are forcing your views on the States. If we went strictly by the constitution, the Christian right would get 90% of what it wants by default. But guys like you don't want that. No. you want a conservative dictatorship over all the States.

And you need to stop lying. I never "supported Trump's stance". I back NC. But Trump is right in that it is a States' right issue, making him much more conservative than you.

[Originalist]

delete