Lee Stoneking Addresses UN

[shazeep]

yes, well if you'll pardon the analogy, it becomes evident in this context why America bringing "freedom" to some other country is so feared, lol. You wield authority like a club. Convinced that you have found Christ, anyone who disagrees must hate Christ. gotcha.

[n david]

Originally Posted by shazeep

yes, well if you'll pardon the analogy, it becomes evident in this context why America bringing "freedom" to some other country is so feared, lol. You wield authority like a club. Convinced that you have found Christ, anyone who disagrees must hate Christ. gotcha.

Not wielding a club, nor am I claiming anyone who disagrees hates Christ.

If WIi simply said he didn't agree, I wouldn't have much of an issue with him. Instead what he's done is call Stoneking and Wilson charlatans, liars and slimy snake oil salesmen.

More importantly, he also called the message which Stoneking gave, which included the New Birth message and mentioned Jesus being the Prince of Peace, "arrogant, slimy and self-serving."

This is more than a simple disagreement. This is hatred of Christ and the New Birth message.

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Thinker

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1. Stoneking was told that from people living in that area that claim to know what news and media may not have disclosed... So who do we trust his firsthand sources or you some bitter muslim dude living on a apostolic page spewing insults and providing flawed error ridden points from surfing google and wikipedia?? you are no authority..

2. This was taken from Wilsons twitter: "please note this is not our service. This is just a picture of what the UN Chapel looks like. We are sorry for any confusion."

You twist the intent to be some groveling immoral confession.. This was very focused and accurate NOT to some admittance of deception.

The funny thing is this WALKS IN ISLAM guy did the same thing and is as arrogant as always.. and Wii is the one now throwing around names and calling insults


..

So wildon finally realizes and admits he should have made it clear the photo wasn't of his service to begin with....

[Esaias]

I watched a message last night by David Wilkerson on why people hate Christians. Some of the comments here prove his point.

Anyways, how long is this thread going to go on? What's the record length of a thread on AFF (besides the old Tab)?

[Thinker]

Originally Posted by jfrog

So wildon finally realizes and admits he should have made it clear the photo wasn't of his service to begin with....

Yes.. you made a far assessment..

his statements were: "he sees it was not wise, but the attempt was not to deceive, in another tweet added clear identification of all of his pictures and pointed out the ONE picture used from online and added -- sorry for the confusion"

then on his twitter he pointed out which was his photos and ONE photo that was not..

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by n david

Not wielding a club, nor am I claiming anyone who disagrees hates Christ.

If WIi simply said he didn't agree, I wouldn't have much of an issue with him. Instead what he's done is call Stoneking and Wilson charlatans, liars and slimy snake oil salesmen.

More importantly, he also called the message which Stoneking gave, which included the New Birth message and mentioned Jesus being the Prince of Peace, "arrogant, slimy and self-serving."

This is more than a simple disagreement. This is hatred of Christ and the New Birth message.

well, you be the judge, apparently. I notice all of you "white heaven" types begin by denying, and then finish with confirming, your opinion as sacrosanct, convinced that Scripture is backing you up all the way. He never called Christ slimy, but only Stoneking. but since Stoneking lubs him some Jesus, any dissenters automatically become antichrist, and it becomes ok to call them every name in the book, and may as well toss in a few jabs at Islam while you're at it. Whatever. If OPs go to heaven, please send me to hell.

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by Esaias

I watched a message last night by David Wilkerson on why people hate Christians. Some of the comments here prove his point.

Well, i read about a guy who loved Christ, and changed his nation peacefully, unlike most Christians, who seem intent upon doing it at the point of a gun, and oblivious as to why their nation is in shreds. And he wasn't even a Christian. A telling quote came out of that,

"Christians are so unlike Christ."

So I'm not sure which point Mr Wilkerson was making, but as long as it's not the one where all Muslims, or Whomever--pick the group--are hopelessly deceived and going to hell, and he knows how to "help" them, then i say amen.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

well, you be the judge, apparently. I notice all of you "white heaven" types begin by denying, and then finish with confirming, your opinion as sacrosanct, convinced that Scripture is backing you up all the way. He never called Christ slimy, but only Stoneking. but since Stoneking lubs him some Jesus, any dissenters automatically become antichrist, and it becomes ok to call them every name in the book, and may as well toss in a few jabs at Islam while you're at it. Whatever. If OPs go to heaven, please send me to hell.

You shock me, shazeep. Wow.

[shazeep]

well, good. i am not interested in being a party to the Perceived Enemy Doctrine.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

well, good. i am not interested in being a party to the Perceived Enemy Doctrine.

Your words about hell are over the line. Says something.