Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:50 PM
tv1a's Avatar
tv1a tv1a is offline
God's Son


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,743
The issue isn't the the success or failure of snake handling. If success or failure was the issue, than most preachers are failures when they pray for the sick. Do the majority of the people you annoint with oil walk away healed? How many people have you prayed for time after time for the same conditions leave with the same problems they asked prayer for? Does that mean God didn't mean it when he said to call for the elders of the church, annointing the sick with oil and they shall recover? Not on your life. There are people who haven't been bitten or died from snake bite.

Most of the points made about this subject are rehashed opinions. I'm neutral on the topic. I don't think either side is more correct than the other. No one has conclusively made the point this activity is a sin. It's a speculative opinion which no one will burn in hell over.

Just because others may hold a more popular opinion about snake handlers, doesn't mean they are right. I'm not suggesting they are wrong, but when one steps away from their preconceived ideas and really study this out and think this through, our intial responses to this activity may not be as black and white as we want it to appear.

Since you tire of the hijacked portion the thread, and so am I. Should we get back to the topic of the thread?

Quote:
1. I believe repentance, Jesus name baptism, and the infilling of the Holy Ghost.

2. I believe in prayer.

3. I believe in Bible reading

4. I believe in witnessing and outreach.

5. I believe in discipling people.

6. I believe Biblical holiness is based on Biblical principles.

7. I believe in One God.

8. I believe a follower of Christ should display the Fruit of the Spirt.

9. I do not see anywhere a clothesline is listed as a Fruit of the Spirit.

10. I believe in modesty, gender separation, and clothing that doesn't draw attention to oneself.

11. I believe in using the same principle for television as I do the internet.

12. I believe in mercy and grace.

13. I believe in love.

14. I believe I love to have some more ice cream.

15. I believe in walking in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh.

16. I believe in miracles signs and wonders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRFrance View Post
If they have a legitimate point, why have so many of them died while handling snakes,when all they were trying to do is glorify God? They're obeying God's word... and end up getting killed for it? Sorry. I'm just not getting that.


(I'm assuming assume you know theres a difference between the letter of the law and the spirit/intent.)
Yes, I believe that ultra-literal application of the letter of the word, rather than the spirit of the word can often be foolish, such as the position you are advocating or defending.

I'm name-calling? What name did I call you? Now you're being hyper-sensitive brother. No one called you any names. To say that someone is defending a foolish point is not to say the person is a fool. No one called you a fool. No need to put words in my mouth. If you feel foolish because some of us here are telling you we think your point is weak, then thats on you, but no one is calling you any names.

Lemme ask this.. when you claimed I was taking "a silly stance" back on --> that TDJakes thread (see post #46) ... should I consider that to be "name-calling" on your part? If it was, then maybe we both owe each other an apology.

TV1...this is not the Nickelodeon or Disney board brother, this is an Apostolic discussion forum. If you are so easily offended then maybe you should pray for tougher skin. People are going to strongly disagree with your points sometimes, so as long as no one is disrespecting you, its counterproductive to get all offended because someone strongly disagrees with your point.

My Reckart-like post? Now THAT's funny. I'm not sure if I was supposed to be offended or amused by that. But I did find it amusing.


OK...ding ding ding !! There we see it.

(Look at what you wrote there. Look real close. And think about what you're really saying or implying there)

That is the key difference between you and me on this issue. If we are to put no conditions (?) on it, then you're saying maybe its ok to unconditionally and indiscriminately drink some cyanide to glorify God? In that case then how about if someone decided he was going to drink some cyanide every morning to prove God? Why do you think church folks don't actually do that in the real world? Would you think that's wise? God gives us the gift of common sense, bro. Even when something is written in black and white of scripture, there is still a place for God-given common sense in applying the word situationally.

There are many verses of scripture that, that if a person were to always apply them literally, unconditionally, and indiscriminately, would and could lead a person into a physically and spiritually dangerous situation far outside the intended meaning of the particular scripture.

I could give you many such examples, but let me just give you 2 real quick. Jesus says if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. So if a man has a problem with looking lustfully at women, do you think Jesus demands that the man pluck an eye out? Or if he has problem with stealing, do you think Jesus wants him to literally chop his hands off? The answer there would be no, as I guess you also know. Now someone could literally pluck his eye out in that situation, and "back it up" with scripture. But how many of us would think the man applied that passage correctly for the situation? I would think probably none.

I have to seriously wonder how much you've thought through your positions. Its as if you say something, and you feel you have to defend your point to the death, even when others are showing you clear shortcomings in your argument. (This is not our first time butting heads, TV1 ; I'm beginning to sense a pattern here)


And then you accuse me of articulating:

I'm not thinking it through?
Um... that's not even making sense right now, buddy.
As for me, I think I've actually spent more time on this than it really deserves.

You certainly don't have to listen to me, but feel free to listen to some of the other points others have made on this same thread. It doesn't make sense sometimes to assume that everybody else got it wrong but you.

Have a good day sir.
__________________
A religious spirit allows people to tolerate hatred and anger under the guise of passion and holiness. Bill Johnson

Legalism has no pity on people. Legalism makes my opinion your burden, makes opinion your boundary, makes my opinion your obligation-Lucado

Some get spiritual because they see the light. Others because they feel the heat.Ray Wylie Hubbard

Definition of legalism- Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. TV
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KH believes the Light Doctrine?? stmatthew Fellowship Hall 500 09-15-2024 08:32 AM
New Church Order Pastor Keith Fellowship Hall 86 07-20-2007 07:58 AM
Why this scientist believes in God Tech The Newsroom 2 04-06-2007 02:42 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.