Praise the Lord. Are you sure that you are not equating nastiness with straight forward honest based off of the Word?
A few things that he taught may have been to the extreme ( but not major doctrine ) that Bishop Hunter came behind and clarified, but what did he teach that was really "man-made"?
I should re-state that as 'Bishop Hunter later came behind him and correctly RE-DEFINED'.
I always find it interesting when people don't quite understand something, they say things like "the bible speaks of things, not as though they were." It is even more interesting when someone rather believe the teachings of a man, a flawed man, and the bible states that we are all flawed, except Christ, than believe what is written in God's word. As many gave the scriptures more than once, Jesus Christ IS in heaven right now, and the scriptures say so. As someone said, they did not give any interpretation but only stated the scripture and yet because a man said ain't no son of God in heaven, they'd rather go with the flawed man. Or that man stated, I know the scripture says Is the Son of God, but it meant WAS the Son of God, it's laughable. It's really troubling. To understand the God head is to understand a deep thing. To state there is a son of God in heaven, does not in Any way, shape or form mean that there is more than one God. However, it does mean that you do not DENY God's witness that He said would remain at his right hand side until His enemies be made his footstool, and the last enemy is death, and we all know that death is still very much apart of life, therefore, since that last enemy has not been made Christ's footstool yet, then He must remain, even now at the right hand side of the Father, like it said He would, until death is defeated, being His last enemy.
All of that conversation and still like the poster said no scripture for the belief that there is no Son of God now. I know this is a little deep, but look up when Jesus hands all over to THE LORD, that THEY may be ALL in ALL.
To argue that there is no Son of God now, or no Son of God in heaven is to be arguing in complete and utter ignorance. You just don't know because your worship and your admiration of a man who was wrong on this issue, outweighs your worship of God who said the complete opposite in His word! Whew, been holding that in for A WHILE!
I always find it interesting when people don't quite understand something, they say things like "the bible speaks of things, not as though they were." It is even more interesting when someone rather believe the teachings of a man, a flawed man, and the bible states that we are all flawed, except Christ, than believe what is written in God's word. As many gave the scriptures more than once, Jesus Christ IS in heaven right now, and the scriptures say so. As someone said, they did not give any interpretation but only stated the scripture and yet because a man said ain't no son of God in heaven, they'd rather go with the flawed man. Or that man stated, I know the scripture says Is the Son of God, but it meant WAS the Son of God, it's laughable. It's really troubling. To understand the God head is to understand a deep thing. To state there is a son of God in heaven, does not in Any way, shape or form mean that there is more than one God. However, it does mean that you do not DENY God's witness that He said would remain at his right hand side until His enemies be made his footstool, and the last enemy is death, and we all know that death is still very much apart of life, therefore, since that last enemy has not been made Christ's footstool yet, then He must remain, even now at the right hand side of the Father, like it said He would, until death is defeated, being His last enemy.
All of that conversation and still like the poster said no scripture for the belief that there is no Son of God now. I know this is a little deep, but look up when Jesus hands all over to THE LORD, that THEY may be ALL in ALL.
To argue that there is no Son of God now, or no Son of God in heaven is to be arguing in complete and utter ignorance. You just don't know because your worship and your admiration of a man who was wrong on this issue, outweighs your worship of God who said the complete opposite in His word! Whew, been holding that in for A WHILE!
you know what I wonder about? I wonder about people who pop up and raise an old thread from the dead by making some odd point or other as though they are continuing a discussion...
i dont get it.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
you know what I wonder about? I wonder about people who pop up and raise an old thread from the dead by making some odd point or other as though they are continuing a discussion...
you know what I wonder about? I wonder about people who pop up and raise an old thread from the dead by making some odd point or other as though they are continuing a discussion...
i dont get it.
I tried to post this in 2009 and had a problem with the admins making me a registered user. Not that I really owe an explanation. But thanks for your comment.
And what is odd about the point? The last 20 pages were about the very subject I posted about, albeit years ago. But, God Bless you!
Meanwhile, is there something wrong with the meat of what I posted? I didn't think so.
hey its just the cantanerous Ferd or AFF... but seriously i cant remember what I was thinking about yesterday. Youve been wanting to post this about this for 6 years????? wow....
your all fired up about letting us know how awful some dead guy is/was? seems odd....
as to your point, I honestly do not for the life of me understand what you are saying.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
All I did was read the thread. One of the posters couldn't admit there was a Son of God in heaven. Saying this somehow meant there is another God. All I did was read the thread and comment. I mean it is 65 pages long and the comments do exist.
Linear Mode
