Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2024, 10:27 AM
Tithesmeister Tithesmeister is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,011
Re: Initial evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa View Post
Isn’t that Don’s thought process concerning soteriology? His premise is that with a few verses God has given a plan B for those who have never heard the Gospel. Hence we who continue to point to scripture are somehow limiting God’s forgiveness. Don views you, Esaias, and myself as portraying God as too hard?
Putting God in a box how? Can God have my cat warn me verbally concerning impending doom? Well, we do have a talking donkey and snake in the Bible. Yet, God doesn’t continually use those vehicle to teach mankind. Can God transport us with fiery chariots across the world? We do have a verse? Yet, again this isn’t a mode of transportation for everyone. Rightly dividing the Word of God isn’t putting Him in a box.
I have personally heard animals speak several times in my life.

Mostly they were parrots.

Sometimes they were humans.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-20-2024, 07:32 AM
Amanah's Avatar
Amanah Amanah is offline
This is still that!


 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 9,839
Re: Initial evidence

The reason this is important is because if someone thinks they have the Holy Spirit because they have the gift of wisdom, but really they need to speak in tongues, they are being seriously misled.
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. ~Tolkien

Last edited by Amanah; 08-20-2024 at 08:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2024, 07:56 AM
Evang.Benincasa's Avatar
Evang.Benincasa Evang.Benincasa is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood too


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 40,950
Re: Initial evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanah View Post
The reason this is important is because if someone thinks they have the Holy Spirit because they have the gift of wisdom, but really they need to speak in tongues, they are being seriously mislead.
Excellently put.
__________________
"all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2024, 11:30 AM
Amanah's Avatar
Amanah Amanah is offline
This is still that!


 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 9,839
Re: Initial evidence

Pls seriously help me pray about this. I believe God can turn this around. I believe God can bring a revelation of truth, agree with me in Jesus name.
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. ~Tolkien
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2024, 02:38 PM
Evang.Benincasa's Avatar
Evang.Benincasa Evang.Benincasa is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood too


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 40,950
Re: Initial evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanah View Post
Pls seriously help me pray about this. I believe God can turn this around. I believe God can bring a revelation of truth, agree with me in Jesus name.
Praying in Jesus name
__________________
"all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2024, 12:31 PM
Amanah's Avatar
Amanah Amanah is offline
This is still that!


 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 9,839
Re: Initial evidence

One of the CACI Elders wives liked the FB post and sent me this link in agreement.

https://alifeofholiness.wordpress.co...taqcd4wE7wHHbw

**

An excerpt from her book:

"There is a lot of confusion out there regarding speaking in other tongues. Some people believe tongues is necessary for salvation, some believe that tongues is a gift that only certain people receive, some believe that tongues is a prayer language, and some believe tongues is demonic.

The truth is, the infilling of the Holy Spirit is necessary for salvation, and speaking in tongues is the evidence of that."
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. ~Tolkien

Last edited by Amanah; 08-20-2024 at 12:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-20-2024, 01:12 PM
coksiw coksiw is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,204
Re: Initial evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanah View Post
One of the CACI Elders wives liked the FB post and sent me this link in agreement.

https://alifeofholiness.wordpress.co...taqcd4wE7wHHbw

**

An excerpt from her book:

"There is a lot of confusion out there regarding speaking in other tongues. Some people believe tongues is necessary for salvation, some believe that tongues is a gift that only certain people receive, some believe that tongues is a prayer language, and some believe tongues is demonic.

The truth is, the infilling of the Holy Spirit is necessary for salvation, and speaking in tongues is the evidence of that."
That's good news
__________________
"The entirety of Your word is truth" (Ps 119:160)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-20-2024, 01:38 PM
Tithesmeister Tithesmeister is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,011
Re: Initial evidence

We still have no direct evidence of speaking in tongues being the initial evidence. It may be helpful to wonder why prophesying is not considered the initial evidence. Prophesying certainly accompanies receiving the Holy Ghost in several instances in the New Testament.

What if they are both evidence? I think we have as much scriptural evidence for prophesying being a sign. And Joel said your sons and daughters will prophesy. He didn’t say they would speak in tongues.

I’m just trying to thoroughly vet the doctrine.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-20-2024, 04:07 PM
coksiw coksiw is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,204
Re: Initial evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tithesmeister View Post
We still have no direct evidence of speaking in tongues being the initial evidence. It may be helpful to wonder why prophesying is not considered the initial evidence. Prophesying certainly accompanies receiving the Holy Ghost in several instances in the New Testament.

What if they are both evidence? I think we have as much scriptural evidence for prophesying being a sign. And Joel said your sons and daughters will prophesy. He didn’t say they would speak in tongues.

I’m just trying to thoroughly vet the doctrine.
TM, the narrative in the Bible is not a set of stories units, listing all details of all events happening in it so you can do criminal-style investigation, or worse, mathematical proofs. It is narrative, ancient theological narrative. If what you are looking for is a perfect uniform listing of evidences on every single story unit, you won't find it.

You need to see what Luke is trying to communicate to you, and what he references to when he skips details and instead just allude to something. Here is the hint: all conversions in Acts have an implicit reference to the experience in Acts 2. Chapter 1 and 2 of Acts is the foundation of the Biblical theology of the rest of the book, and you can understand that by study Acts as an ancient narrative of an author called Luke with his narrative style.
__________________
"The entirety of Your word is truth" (Ps 119:160)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-20-2024, 04:37 PM
Tithesmeister Tithesmeister is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,011
Re: Initial evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by coksiw View Post
TM, the narrative in the Bible is not a set of stories units, listing all details of all events happening in it so you can do criminal-style investigation, or worse, mathematical proofs. It is narrative, ancient theological narrative. If what you are looking for is a perfect uniform listing of evidences on every single story unit, you won't find it.

You need to see what Luke is trying to communicate to you, and what he references to when he skips details and instead just allude to something. Here is the hint: all conversions in Acts have an implicit reference to the experience in Acts 2. Chapter 1 and 2 of Acts is the foundation of the Biblical theology of the rest of the book, and you can understand that by study Acts as an ancient narrative of an author called Luke with his narrative style.
So. Give me stronger evidence that tongues is the initial evidence than the evidence for prophecy. I’m not saying tongues is not the initial evidence. What I am saying is that there is no evidence from scripture that tongues is THE initial evidence. And I’m not just talking about Acts. I’m talking about the entire Bible.

Here’s why. If it is so important that we each individually speak in tongues, why doesn’t the words of God say that explicitly?

Another thing: Does speaking in tongues mean you are saved?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saved at faith or initial evidence? houston Fellowship Hall 42 09-23-2014 03:11 PM
The Gift of Tongues and Initial Evidence Justin Fellowship Hall 99 08-30-2013 09:45 PM
The Initial Physical Evidence samp Deep Waters 138 03-12-2007 10:25 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Costeon

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.