Forum Ignorance

[Nahum]

I suggest some of us take the day off folks.

See ya tomorrow.

[Felicity]

"Antagonism" is in the eyes of the beholder perhaps? To be honest considering the number of posts Dan makes I think he handles himself impressively well. That doesn't mean those who get in the ring with him don't get frustrated -- he has his own style to be sure, but I think he fights fair overall.

Just my opinion. From the back pew ........er, I mean row. LOL.

[Pragmatist]

I think spamming or nuisance posting is a legitimate issue. The forum is for all of us and we (and admin) decide as a community what is allowable. If one person bumps all their threads and it removes all the other threads from that day (which happened on another forum) I do not think it should be acceptable. I am not speaking of whatever happened yesterday because I don't know what happened. But anything goes shouldn't be acceptable either. That isn't in the rules, it's just MY opinion. The forum is for the enjoyment and edification of the majority, IMO.

[Ferd]

the french are wonderful people.















































I just wanted to join in and say something ignorant on a forum.

[Amos]

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

I think spamming or nuisance posting is a legitimate issue. The forum is for all of us and we (and admin) decide as a community what is allowable. If one person bumps all their threads and it removes all the other threads from that day (which happened on another forum) I do not think it should be acceptable. I am not speaking of whatever happened yesterday because I don't know what happened. But anything goes shouldn't be acceptable either. That isn't in the rules, it's just MY opinion. The forum is for the enjoyment and edification of the majority, IMO.

I agree.

I also think admin has to have the leeway to address things that aren't specifically covered in the rules, but that can have a negative effect on the forum.

Another thing to consider is that we really don't know why he was banned.

The idea that it was the bumping of all the threads is really only an assumption. There may be an issue we don't know about.

[Margies3]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

In Admin Review - I'd suggest no more comments while it's being reviewed.

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Bro, no one on this forum has butted heads with DA more than me. I promise.

I just feel it unfair to speak negatively about someone who is not here to defend himself.

Personally, I think this thread should be closed.

BTW, thanks for your kindness. You're a pal.

I agree. Back on page TWO, we were asked by Renda to make no more comments while this is being reviewed. Here we are on page SEVEN.

this reminds me of a class full of 13 year olds. My 13 year old absolutely has to have the last word - even if you agree with him, he still has to have the last word. My 17 year old was like that at the age of 13 as well. So I know that my young one will grow out of it. But folks.............. I'm wondering here..................

[Tina]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

In Admin Review - I'd suggest no more comments while it's being reviewed.

Since this seems to have been ignored, I'm going to lock this thread for now. If one of the other admins thinks it needs reopened later, they can do so.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

In Admin Review - I'd suggest no more comments while it's being reviewed.

Thanks Tina - you beat me to it!