DT, if the poor fellow would just read some of what I've written here, he might learn a thing or two.
I've layed down a pretty solid edumaction today, if I do say so myself.
Not, Ferd ... you simply tried to disassociate the party from the fascist tag. Both Fascism and communism are not uniquely American ... both models are for the most part European in character ... but ideals have been espoused by many living here for decades ...
McCarthyism ring a bell?
I don't fear labels ... sometimes they are just that ... and sometimes their is a figment of truth in them.
Not, Ferd ... you simply tried to disassociate the party from the fascist tag. Both Fascism and communism are not uniquely American ... both models are for the most part European in character ... but ideals have been espoused by many living here for decades ...
McCarthyism ring a bell?
I don't fear labels ... sometimes they are just that ... and sometimes their is a figment of truth in them.
Check me Daniel, I was speaking of the American Conservitives. NOT the republican party! in fact I stated that there ARE Fascists in the Republican party.
McCarthyism is a debate in and of itself. I am not willing to connect it to Fascism. Bad mojo for sure but Fascism? Not willing to say that.
and that bit about Fascism and communism not being uniquely American? well we agree 100%
just dont tag the American Conservitive movement with the fascist lable. we aint it.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
Check me Daniel, I was speaking of the American Conservitives. NOT the republican party! in fact I stated that there ARE Fascists in the Republican party.
McCarthyism is a debate in and of itself. I am not willing to connect it to Fascism. Bad mojo for sure but Fascism? Not willing to say that.
and that bit about Fascism and communism not being uniquely American? well we agree 100%
just dont tag the American Conservitive movement with the fascist lable. we aint it.
American conservatives aint it. But via the Republican Party they are married to it. Only conservatives that vote Constitutionalist can argue that they have completely broken ranks from the neo-con fascists of the Republican party.
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
Racial and ethnic slurs are not needed. That exposes much about the spirit behind many.
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
Chris, how about getting an edumaction before you type such hype.
dude, what kind of non-sense is this?
I disagreed with GWB and the Republican Congress on a number of issues, but to suggest that the fact that these two bodies agreed on issues is somehow fascist is simplistic boardering on paranoia!
Bush didn’t see a Republican bill he didn’t love. He didn’t use veto, even when it would have been good for our country. It’s a symptom of fascist one party rule. Many real Republicans are not patrician hacks, and they’re willing to admit that the Republican party has gone down the road of fascism and extremism. Anyone with a lick of sense can see this.
Quote:
Ever consider that he didnt veto anything because he agreed with the legislation? Maybe had some of his team working with the Republican leadership to create the legislation?
what a crackpot, hairbrain theory.
One party rule without challenge, that’s not “government”…that’s rulership. The President is the nation’s chief executive…Bush used it as a fast track to pass every Republican initiative into law even when it was bad for the American people. They say power corrupts…and the one party rule provided near absolute power and has rendered the current leadership of the Republican party absolutely corrupt.
Fascist one party rule is what the Republicans have given us and wish to build upon in the coming years. They’d make it illegal to be a Democrat if they could. They have a vile fascist globalist agenda. Their real constituents are massive globalized corporations that aim to put the common man out of business until they have aggregated all wealth into their sphere and advance into a fascist world government. The Republican goal is redistribution of wealth…distributing it from the public trust and free market into the massive global corporate conglomerates.
__________________
"For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for wholeness and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jeremiah 29:11 (English Standard Version)
Bush didn’t see a Republican bill he didn’t love. He didn’t use veto, even when it would have been good for our country. It’s a symptom of fascist one party rule. Many real Republicans are not patrician hacks, and they’re willing to admit that the Republican party has gone down the road of fascism and extremism. Anyone with a lick of sense can see this.
One party rule without challenge, that’s not “government”…that’s rulership. The President is the nation’s chief executive…Bush used it as a fast track to pass every Republican initiative into law even when it was bad for the American people. They say power corrupts…and the one party rule provided near absolute power and has rendered the current leadership of the Republican party absolutely corrupt.
Fascist one party rule is what the Republicans have given us and wish to build upon in the coming years. They’d make it illegal to be a Democrat if they could. They have a vile fascist globalist agenda. Their real constituents are massive globalized corporations that aim to put the common man out of business until they have aggregated all wealth into their sphere and advance into a fascist world government. The Republican goal is redistribution of wealth…distributing it from the public trust and free market into the massive global corporate conglomerates.
Chris, please stop with the goofy stuff. you are embarrassing yourself!
Dude, please! Republicans dealt with a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. NO law was passed that the Dems didn't agree to prevent from passing!
much of the legislation that did pass, that Bush did sign was supported by a number of democrats.
Are you going to say the same thing if Obama wins and the Dems pick up seats in both houses of congress? will the Dems all the sudden be Fascists???
what hypocrisy! but then again, hypocrisy seems to be the name of the game with you.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
TRFrance 
Hybrid Mode
