It really bothers me that LS feels that just because he has testimonies of people that have laid their hair out and seen their family members healed, he feels this confirms his doctrine. ie. I get results, you don't, so what I'm preaching is right.
What about all the women that have not cut their hair that have had horrible things happen to their families? Also, just because you see results doesn't mean that you are right with God...Benny Hinn sees results all the time...so does David Copperfield...
Basing your relationship with God on your hair? Seriously?
I'm beyond disgusted.
__________________
"If you're riding ahead of the herd, take a look back every now and then to make sure it's still there."
It really bothers me that LS feels that just because he has testimonies of people that have laid their hair out and seen their family members healed, he feels this confirms his doctrine. ie. I get results, you don't, so what I'm preaching is right.
What about all the women that have not cut their hair that have had horrible things happen to their families? Also, just because you see results doesn't mean that you are right with God...Benny Hinn sees results all the time...so does David Copperfield...
Basing your relationship with God on your hair? Seriously?
I'm beyond disgusted.
I think they are loosely defining the word "heal" as well.
I would remind the forum that healings in the times of Jesus were often immediate, permanent, and observable.
You may have said "I don't care what you think at least 25-30 times in both of these messages,
But the mere fact that you have spent considerable amount of pulpit time defending your heretical doctrine is evidence enough that you do care.
Rather than cursing those who disagree with you by tarnishing God and suggesting he will strike down those who love Truth as much as you do - why not preach the power of Christ and the Cross?
You may have said "I don't care what you think at least 25-30 times in both of these messages,
But the mere fact that you have spent considerable amount of pulpit time defending your heretical doctrine is evidence enough that you do care.
Rather than cursing those who disagree with you by tarnishing God and suggesting he will strike down those who love Truth as much as you do - why not preach the power Christ and the Cross?
Regards,
Dan Alicea
Sad thing is, Daniel, he thinks he is!
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
All I can think is: "Let him who THINKS he stands, take heed lest he fall!"
I've seen this type of behavior repeated. Supposed "revelation" w/o bible, preach the revelation, proof-text the revelation; use extra-biblical support, resistance against the revelation, "authority" preached to bolster the revelation, judgment preached against the resistant, arrogance increases, then comes the fall!
I honestly pray that the latter doesn't happen to LS. But it's inevitable if he persists. May God have mercy upon him and those who hear him...seriously!
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
I would rather be a tadpole yelling at a butterfly swimming and soaking in His living waters of Spirit and Truth ... that a self-propelled butterfly, flapping my wings to merit flight and being blown about by every wind of doctrine.
This man has lost his way seeking revelation over the revealed Word.
Demonstrations a latter day spirit in lieu of the redeeming, quickening and regenerating work of the Holy Spirit and Christ's finished work of the Cross.
A message of exclusivity and vengeance instead of grace.
In my resignation letter in 2006, I told DKB that I choose to fall on the side of grace.
LS teaches a gospel ridden with meritorial obedience. It is another gospel. Let his message be anathema.
What kind of response did you receive back from your letter? "Don't let the door hit ya...........?"
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Hybrid Mode
