55th Annual Campmeeting (For Bro Eply)

[Abiding Now]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

For precept must be on precept,
precept on precept;
line on line, line on line;
here a little, and there a little

The precept on precept is to prevent incorrect interpretations of scripture.
It is because that people do not follow the two witness precept that we have so many false doctrines.

Everything I teach is based on at least two scriptures, for years I have always gone by this precept.
I so strongly believe in this precept that I have never once preached a sermon without at least two scriptures.
I can send you a mountain of my sermons and you will see that all my sermons always have 2 scriptures or more, every single one of my sermons.

So, are you a preterist? JW

[kclee4jc]

Originally Posted by Abiding Now

If they believe this, how can they label themselves preterist?

I was wondering the same thing...

[Abiding Now]

Originally Posted by kclee4jc

I was wondering the same thing...

Maybe they can explain it to us.

[Steve Epley]

Going to be a busy week getting everything ready.

[Abiding Now]

Originally Posted by Kevin Archer

I'm sure the food would be worth the effort.

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by Abiding Now

If they believe this, how can they label themselves preterist?

Sorry, been busy.

The reason that they were labeled that is because they were not dispensationalists and the dispees have a habit of labeling everyone a preterist if you are not like them.

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by kclee4jc

No....we would be Bible believers. I don't need 50 references to establish doctrine. If it says it, it means it.

You may not need fifty but you do need more than one. Sorry folks, but that is why you got sucked up into the false doctrine of dispensationalism.

Dispensationalism is trinitarian in origin and you bought it hook line and sinker.

Rev 20 is the only, and I mean the only place that 1000 years is mentioned in that fashion. It is mentioned in a figurative sense, how else can you have beheaded and martyered souls ruling and reigning?

Ah, but that is right. You are a dispee and you "Take it like it is written!"

So the beasts are literal, the seas and all that, literal too?

That is why you got sucked up into that heresy, because you don't build on a good foundation of Biblical study.

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

It is not out of context
every doctrine needs to be supported by at least two scriptures.
to do otherwise is to be non-biblical.

Also is should have some sort of foundation in the Old Testament. The Old should always point the way to the New.

Where in the Old Testament is the Millenium Reign pointed to? Where is the OT foundation?

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

The midwest is funny that way. They get all upset over differences in eschatology and this man wont preach that man and vice versa.

The funny thing is, many of them that do preach each other have other differences that they conveniently overlook. Christmas and etc. Never quite figured it out but...

They will fight each other over prophecy, wine versus grape juice, all manner of things, unles they happen to be friends... then it changes everything.

I know of a situation around me that one man wouldn't fellowship them preterists, but would have a preacher evangelist park at his church that was a preterist and a carpenter. Now, it was okay for him to fellowship him, because the man was also working on his church, but any others.... oh my.

Lots of double standards it seems.

I watched, as the witch hunts escalated 7 years ago, the atttudes split groups and pitted brothers against brothers and have come to the conclusion that there will be some men that will have to either repent of their sins or will die lost. And I don't mean preterism.

The Bible doesn't say that you have to believe in a rapture to be saved, but it does say that you have to love your brother and that group has a lot of hatred in it. Hope some repent before it is too late.

As for me and my house... I am better off gone from it.

Don't expose the hypocrisy.

Move along...nothing to see here.

[Abiding Now]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

Sorry, been busy.

The reason that they were labeled that is because they were not dispensationalists and the dispees have a habit of labeling everyone a preterist if you are not like them.

Strange. What about tribulationists, the dispensationalists fellowship with them?