Another Mass Shooting

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Originalist

There are people who will do anything to get restrictive gun laws passed.

Well, thanks for at least offering what could be an angle-- though I think that what you are suggesting is highly unlikely.

Then again, I don't know what would be "likely" in this situation.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Less than 5 hours after the attack, people are calling it, "at least an act of domestic terrorism."

Chief Brugan

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Less than 5 hours after the attack, people are calling it, "at least an act of domestic terrorism."

Chief Brugan

Yet you aren't as quick to claim terrorism here as you were the PP shooting.

You're like the NFL. They can't define a catch and constantly contradict themselves. You call one shooting a terrorist act, but won't call this one the same.

Why not?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Less than 5 hours after the attack, people are calling it, "at least an act of domestic terrorism."

Chief Brugan

What does your dear leader call it? I'll tell you what he'll say.... If they're not white or Christian he'll call it everything BUT terrorism. If they're white or Christian, he'll call it an act of domestic terror.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

What do you want him to say?

He's the POTUS. People expect him to respond. I don't get your criticism of him in THIS scenario.

My only issue is he jumps to politicize every shooting. Before the dead bodies even are cold. Grieve for the families. Offer condolences. But keep politics out of it.

obama's like a bad ambulance chasing lawyer. Gleefully rubbing his hands whenever a shooting occurs, excited at the opportunity to do what he's wanted to do from the beginning... Make Americans defenseless.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

If it is an act of terrorism, what would be the motivation behind killing the developmentally handicapped?

I just don't know the angle here. This appears to take senseless to a whole new level.

Excuses, excuses. Terrorism doesn't care about who the victims are.

Of course, if the shooters are white, registered Republican, NRA card carrying, tea party members...you'll change your mind and call it an act of terror.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by n david

Yet you aren't as quick to claim terrorism here as you were the PP shooting.

You're like the NFL. They can't define a catch and constantly contradict themselves. You call one shooting a terrorist act, but won't call this one the same.

Why not?

No bro, you are wrong on your supposition here. Check the dates of the PP attack and my subsequent posts.

If there is any hesitance, it is because, like I mentioned, I just don't know what the angle would be for killing a bunch of developmentally handicapped people.

I've said that twice now.

Calm down.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

No bro, you are wrong on your supposition here. Check the dates of the PP attack and my subsequent posts.

If there is any hesitance, it is because, like I mentioned, I just don't know what the angle would be for killing a bunch of developmentally handicapped people.

I've said that twice now.

Calm down.

Who said anything about developmentally handicapped people being killed. There was also a government agency party happening in the conference room where the attack was focused.

I'm quite calm, thanks.

[n david]

"At first, Dorothy Vong assumed it was a drill -- just like all the others at her work.

At the Inland Regional Center, where she's a nurse, the staff works with clients and parents of clients who are sometimes angry. They have active-shooter drills every month or so."

Well that's interesting...

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...202-story.html

[Sean]

Most of the time we see multiple shooters acting together like this is usually coordinated terrorism...

but we shall see.