Trinitarians Who Baptize in Jesus Name - Page 19

navygoat1998 · #**181** 04-20-2021, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seguidordejesus

That, sir, is a very long story, but I will tell you, it has nothing to do with misbehaving preachers or my wife not wanting to wear a skirt. Search honestly for yourself is all I can say.

Yes sir! Search honestly!

votivesoul · #**182** 04-20-2021, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seguidordejesus

Yes and no. They were not separate at the time so that was the formation of the catholic (universal) church, not the Roman Catholic Church. So ok, sure

Hence no use of the word Roman on my part.

votivesoul · #**183** 04-20-2021, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by votivesoul

Hence no use of the word Roman on my part.

Either way, the Nicene Creed you shared goes back to 325AD and both Roman and Orthodox trace their roots to that conference.

mfblume · #**184** 04-20-2021, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1 God

Leaving the oneness to become trinity is akin to hopping out of the frying pan and into the fire.

As if unitarianism is the better choice.

How come Jesus did not require the cross if he was born like any man and was only man? Sounds like God is a respector of persons.

The test of a doctrine is what it does with the cross. And unitarianism removes the truth of the cross, for if Jesus was not God incarnate, then he was like us with sin, regardless of who fathered him. And if being born of God and still being only human meant Jesus had no sin, then why did not God do that with all the human race since Adam instead of just him? It would have saved the suffering of the cross.