The Son Is Gods Self 1 Hr. Video

[coksiw]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

In my opinion, terminology has been the problem all along. Not just on this website but across the board and through the years.

Isn't that what Greek philosophy was?

[1 God]

Originally Posted by mfblume

You do not stick to the terms God used. John particularly used the phrase that the WORD became flesh and did not say GOD became flesh. The WORD WAS GOD, but still, John did not write "God became flesh."

In fact..... and I told you this before... after we read the WORD became flesh, we read AND DWELT among us.

DWELT means TABERNACLED which explains how the word became flesh. That's John 1. And John 2 has JESUS using that very point and referring to his flesh body as the TEMPLE.

So, the WAY in which the word became flesh was by TABERNACLING in flesh. Was God turned into a temple when he dwelt in a temple?

So, you maybe think the spoken word of God was made flesh as I do?

[Scott Pitta]

Terminology in English, Greek and Latin seem to be problematic.

It might be easier to list the terms everyone agrees with. But even that task might prove impossible.

Perhaps, a list can be generated of terms used exclusively by Oneness theologians. But sadly, and strangely, the old Oneness thinkers are seldom, if ever quoted in theological discussions. So their unique terminology is not part of the contemporary dialogue.