I found this interesting in that article:
Leon Morris points out the serious error of teaching that Christ presented His blood in heaven. It would imply “that Christ’s atoning work was not completed on the cross but that he still had to do some atoning act in heaven like the earthly high priest who took the blood into the Most Holy Place on the Day of Atonement.” Not only is this theory unbiblical but it also gives support to the Roman Catholic/Anglo-Catholic theology of the perpetual offering of the blood of Christ. Heretical groups argue this point to a destructive (cf. 2 Peter 2:1) extreme in teaching that the blood of Christ is used as a perpetual offering in heaven. The theory that Christ needed to take His blood with Him into heaven denies the work of Christ on the cross as being finished. The sacrifice for sin was completed on the cross. However, the subsequent benefits of Christ’s sacrifice extend to the elect and heaven itself (Hebrews 9:23). The appropriation of the benefits of Christ’s death to the elect is the result of His death and victory on the cross. When Scripture states that believers are cleansed by the blood of Christ (1 John 1:7), this does not mean that the literal blood of Christ is physically applied to them; rather, that Christ’s shed blood on the cross is God’s righteous basis for forgiving sinners who have placed their trust for salvation in Christ alone. It is the Spirit that gives life, not the blood (John 6:63). Scripture speaks of a spiritual application rather than a material application. |
Quote:
Also what do you think about that there seems to be evidence to the contrary that Mary did indeed hold Jesus by his feet, in Matthew 28 and evidence of mistranslation of John 20:17? Does this weaken the "He ascended twice" argument? |
Quote:
If the priest touched anything unclean before pouring the blood on the alter behind the vail. The ropes tied around their ankels had bells attached. The priest would then be dragged out of the inner chamber. If it be understood that Jesus being out High Priest. He being the Meidiator between God and Man. He the propitiation for our sins. I John 2:2 So Christ on the way to the Mercy Seat in heaven would not allow anyone to touch him. Then when he allows Thomas to touch him he must have already made his journey. Rev 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called, "The Word of God". I believe the vesture was dipped in John's vision from the place where Jesus poured the Blood of the Lamb to seal the eternal redemption of man. This blood pool for Eternity allows man to exist in Eterinty with him. For by the blood of the Cross are we Saved! |
Quote:
Then in verse 30 Christ Jesus, who God is made unto us, wisdom and righteousness, and sactification, and redemption. I believe Christ had to pour the blood in heaven to justify man being able to enter the gates of Heaven. Sactiification and in our sins being remitted at the Cross is one act of our redemption. Being able or justified having our flesh (Human nature) enter the gates of Heaven. Required the blood of the Lamb to be poured out at the Mercy Seat. |
Quote:
I see it this way also. That He was glorified after He left Mary (John 20:1-18) and before He appeared to the disciples in the room that night as recorded in John 20:19-25. Mark 16:9 says He appeared first to Mary Magdalene. Some time after that and before the women saw Him and held Him by His feet (Matthew 28:9-10 He must have ascended into Heaven and presented His blood or presented Himself as the sacrifice. Later that evening He appeared to the disciples as recorded in John 20:19-25. |
Quote:
Jesus was personally glorified but his body was not glorified until after the resurrection |
Quote:
Jesus clearly said they could NOT touch Him for he had NOT ascended then later they did touch Him so he must have ascended. It is that simple. Surely reading Hebrews and the Atonement taught there He had to place the blood on the Mercy Seat. Calvary was the Brazen Altar and Jesus the High Priest who took the blood into the Holy Place thus the Mercy Seat. That picture done yearly had to symbolize something would it not? |
Quote:
Just as every other high Priest that ever lived had to take the blood into the Holies of Holies, Jesus too HAD to fulfill the sacrifice LAWFULLY in order for the sacrifice to be acceptable. What this person has missed is that the natural tabernacle was built and ordered from the heavenly tabernacle and order. |
Quote:
|
Bump ....
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.