|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

12-01-2012, 05:29 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
|
|
|
Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Last edited by RandyWayne; 12-01-2012 at 05:39 PM.
|

12-01-2012, 06:26 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,600
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
There are many here that have not forgotten what happened in Germany after Hitler disarmed the people.
America could take heed to what Switzerland has in it's borders. This woman would never have to worry about walking the street if we followed Switzerland's example.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/switzerland.asp
http://www.guncite.com/swissgun-kopel.html
If ever a nation had "a well-regulated militia," it is Switzerland. Nineteenth-century economist Adam Smith thought Switzerland the only place where the whole body of the people had successfully been drilled in militia skills.
Indeed, the militia is virtually synonymous with the nation. "The Swiss do not have an army, they are the army, says one government publication. Fully deployed, the Swiss army has 15.2 men per square kilometre; in contrast, the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. have only .2 soldiers per square kilometre. Switzerland is 76 times denser with soldiers than either superpower. Indeed, only Israel has more army per square kilometre.
Switzerland is also the only Western nation to provide shelters fully stocked with food and enough supplies to last a year for all its citizens in case of war. The banks and supermarkets subsidise much of the stockpiling. The banks also have plans to move their gold into the mountainous center of Switzerland in case of invasion.
The nation is ready to mobilise on a moment's notice. Said one Swiss citizen-soldier, "If we start in the morning, we would be mobilised by late afternoon. That is why the gun is at home, the ammunition is at home. The younger people all have automatic rifles. They are ready to fight." Citizen-soldiers on their way to mobilisation points may flag down and commandeer passing automobiles.
So one question remains...why is our government trying to disarm it's citizens?
__________________
It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man. (Psalms 118:8)
|

12-01-2012, 08:02 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreYouReady?
There are many here that have not forgotten what happened in Germany after Hitler disarmed the people.
America could take heed to what Switzerland has in it's borders. This woman would never have to worry about walking the street if we followed Switzerland's example.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/switzerland.asp
http://www.guncite.com/swissgun-kopel.html
If ever a nation had "a well-regulated militia," it is Switzerland. Nineteenth-century economist Adam Smith thought Switzerland the only place where the whole body of the people had successfully been drilled in militia skills.
Indeed, the militia is virtually synonymous with the nation. "The Swiss do not have an army, they are the army, says one government publication. Fully deployed, the Swiss army has 15.2 men per square kilometre; in contrast, the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. have only .2 soldiers per square kilometre. Switzerland is 76 times denser with soldiers than either superpower. Indeed, only Israel has more army per square kilometre.
Switzerland is also the only Western nation to provide shelters fully stocked with food and enough supplies to last a year for all its citizens in case of war. The banks and supermarkets subsidise much of the stockpiling. The banks also have plans to move their gold into the mountainous center of Switzerland in case of invasion.
The nation is ready to mobilise on a moment's notice. Said one Swiss citizen-soldier, "If we start in the morning, we would be mobilised by late afternoon. That is why the gun is at home, the ammunition is at home. The younger people all have automatic rifles. They are ready to fight." Citizen-soldiers on their way to mobilisation points may flag down and commandeer passing automobiles.
So one question remains...why is our government trying to disarm it's citizens?
|
Exactly!
|

12-01-2012, 06:34 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,711
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
what does video have to do with obama? obama has supported 2nd amendment
__________________
|

12-01-2012, 08:03 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind
what does video have to do with obama? obama has supported 2nd amendment
|
Since when?
|

12-01-2012, 08:20 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,711
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne
Since when?
|
you cannot name a single anti gun piece of legislation from obama, though there is pressure for assault weapons regulation
__________________
|

12-01-2012, 09:18 PM
|
 |
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind
you cannot name a single anti gun piece of legislation from obama, though there is pressure for assault weapons regulation
|
1. Hale DeMar, a 52-year-old Wilmette resident, was arrested and charged with misdemeanor violations for shooting, in the shoulder and leg, a burglar who broke into his home not once, but twice. Cook County prosecutors dropped all charges against DeMar.
In March 2004, the Illinois Senate passed Senate Bill 2165, a law introduced in response to DeMar's case, with provisions designed to assert a right of citizens to protect themselves against home invasions, such that self-defense requirements would be viewed to take precedence over local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20. Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against the measure.
2. Obama sought moderate gun control measures, such as a 2000 bill he cosponsored to limit handgun purchases to one per month (it did not pass).
http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/...un_Control.htm
Oh, and......
In 1994 Romney had supported firearms-control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association: the so-called Brady Bill, which restricted the sale of handguns, and the assault weapons ban. During the 1994 senatorial campaign he had taunted: "That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA." He reinforced his support for these measures when he ran for governor in 2002, when he promised not to chip away at the Commonwealth's tough gun laws. Now as a presidential candidate, Romney presented himself disingenuously as a lifetime member of the NRA and a hunter of "varmints," which prompted the acerbic Boston Globe columnist Joan Vennochi to write: "Leave it to Mitt Romney to shoot himself in the foot with a gun he doesn't own."
http://obama.ontheissues.org/2012/Mi...un_Control.htm
__________________
Last edited by Pressing-On; 12-01-2012 at 09:23 PM.
|

12-01-2012, 10:12 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,711
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
1. Hale DeMar, a 52-year-old Wilmette resident, was arrested and charged with misdemeanor violations for shooting, in the shoulder and leg, a burglar who broke into his home not once, but twice. Cook County prosecutors dropped all charges against DeMar.
In March 2004, the Illinois Senate passed Senate Bill 2165, a law introduced in response to DeMar's case, with provisions designed to assert a right of citizens to protect themselves against home invasions, such that self-defense requirements would be viewed to take precedence over local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20. Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against the measure.
2. Obama sought moderate gun control measures, such as a 2000 bill he cosponsored to limit handgun purchases to one per month (it did not pass).
http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/...un_Control.htm
Oh, and......
In 1994 Romney had supported firearms-control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association: the so-called Brady Bill, which restricted the sale of handguns, and the assault weapons ban. During the 1994 senatorial campaign he had taunted: "That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA." He reinforced his support for these measures when he ran for governor in 2002, when he promised not to chip away at the Commonwealth's tough gun laws. Now as a presidential candidate, Romney presented himself disingenuously as a lifetime member of the NRA and a hunter of "varmints," which prompted the acerbic Boston Globe columnist Joan Vennochi to write: "Leave it to Mitt Romney to shoot himself in the foot with a gun he doesn't own."
http://obama.ontheissues.org/2012/Mi...un_Control.htm
|
i meant that as president, obama has not pursued gun control. nor have the democrats.
__________________
|

12-01-2012, 09:18 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,270
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne
Since when?
|
no kiddng he wants to ban about 2 dozen different weapons which is just the beginning
|

12-01-2012, 09:04 PM
|
|
Isaiah 56:4-5
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
|
|
|
Re: Obama's WORST Nightmare!
There are too many rednecks in our military preventing an American Holocaust
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 PM.
| |