His Mercies are new - Jew/Muslim haters.

[donfriesen1]

Everyday God renews his mercies toward us. This, from a God who lives largely out of time, indicating thereby a continuous, not daily, attitude of mercy.

Those who test God's mercies with repeated sin, snub this mercy.

For example: Muslims, at the mention of the word 'Jew', may in their mind exhibit hatred to the Jew. This snubs God's mercy toward the Muslim. Hatred toward those God loves shows a judgment of this love as wrong. God loves all, Jew and Muslim, equally, with perfected love. Hate what God hates. Love what God loves. Hate sin, love the sinners, or is this ecclesiastical narcissism? Show agreement with God. But to label every Muslim as a Jew-hater is wrong, even if a majority of Muslims would exhibit it.

Anyone who would label someone as a ecclesiastical narcissist every time they post, may be exhibiting a continuing attitude akin to the hatred of racism, thereby testing God.

Should every post of any ecclesiastical narcissist be challenged, if they exist? Of course. Each and every time. It may be sinful, or at least an error, not to challenge and expose wrong concepts.

All conclusions of any AFF post should be examined, on an individual basis. Each new concept should be examined as apart from others in the past. What rule determines when a new post is automatically associated? If the poster is repeating past mistakes of unscriptural interpretation or wrong reasoning, then this should be pointed out, using reason and scripture, and the concept rejected. If not using this method, then an attitude similar to the racist or the hateful Muslim, may be exhibited, when associating them with past posts.

Just saying someone is wrong without showing how, does not prove them wrong. Do you agree Dominic? Just saying someone is an ecclesiastical narcissist doesn't show they are, right Dominic? Or is this itself ecclesiastical narcism? Is something anyone else says automatically ecclesiastical narcissism?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by donfriesen1

everyday god renews his mercies toward us. This, from a god who lives largely out of time, indicating thereby a continuous, not daily, attitude of mercy.

Those who test god's mercies with repeated sin, snub this mercy.

For example: Muslims, at the mention of the word 'jew', may in their mind exhibit hatred to the jew. This snubs god's mercy toward the muslim. Hatred toward those god loves shows a judgment of this love as wrong. God loves all, jew and muslim, equally, with perfected love. Hate what god hates. Love what god loves. Hate sin, love the sinners, or is this ecclesiastical narcissism? Show agreement with god. But to label every muslim as a jew-hater is wrong, even if a majority of muslims would exhibit it.

Anyone who would label someone as a ecclesiastical narcissist every time they post, may be exhibiting a continuing attitude akin to the hatred of racism, thereby testing god.

Should every post of any ecclesiastical narcissist be challenged, if they exist? of course. Each and every time. it may be sinful, or at least an error, not to challenge and expose wrong concepts.

All conclusions of any aff post should be examined, on an individual basis. Each new concept should be examined as apart from others in the past. What rule determines when a new post is automatically associated? If the poster is repeating past mistakes of unscriptural interpretation or wrong reasoning, then this should be pointed out, using reason and scripture, and the concept rejected. If not using this method, then an attitude similar to the racist or the hateful muslim, may be exhibited, when associating them with past posts.

Just saying someone is wrong without showing how, does not prove them wrong. Do you agree dominic? Just saying someone is an ecclesiastical narcissist doesn't show they are, right dominic? Or is this itself ecclesiastical narcism? Is something anyone else says automatically ecclesiastical narcissism?

Don, Pastor Doe must be a Sweetie Pie!

[votivesoul]

Don, by calling for all of your threads from now on to be scrutinized and challenged, you are engaging in the very narcissism of which Bro. Benincasa accuses you. This very thread is another example.

You compare a stranger thousands of miles away on the internet calling you an ecclesiastical narcissist to Islamic racism against Jews? By drawing such histrionic attention to yourself, you are showing the forum that your foot fits the shoe.