Something to consider

[Baron1710]

A man who doesn't want to care for a child is a deadbeat.

A woman who doesn't want to is...pro choice.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

A man who doesn't want to care for a child is a deadbeat.

A woman who doesn't want to is...pro choice.

Societal hypocrisy.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

A man who doesn't want to care for a child is a deadbeat.

A woman who doesn't want to is...pro choice.

too true.

[RandyWayne]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

A man who doesn't want to care for a child is a deadbeat.

A woman who doesn't want to is...pro choice.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

A man who doesn't want to care for a child is a deadbeat.

A woman who doesn't want to is...pro choice.

[houston]

That's great. How many of you are willing to adopt a child so he will not be aborted?

[Margies3]

Originally Posted by houston

That's great. How many of you are willing to adopt a child so he will not be aborted?

We did! TWICE. And would have adopted many more if it had been possible at the time.

The fact is that the waiting list for people to adopt is very, very long. You can wait 2-5 years and then still a baby will not become available. It's much easier for a birth mother today to kill her child than it is for her to place that child for adoption. It's interesting. If a girl says that she had an abortion, people give her sympathy and support. But if a girl says that she placed a baby for adoption, people say mean things to her - "How could you possibly GIVE UP a child who is your own flesh and blood! I could never do that!", they will say to her. Sad. just sad.

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by houston

That's great. How many of you are willing to adopt a child so he will not be aborted?

How is that relevant?

Hey you shouldn't kill your neighbor.

Well do you want to feed him?

Many do adopt, but even if no one did it wouldn't make abortion morally acceptable.

[AreYouReady?]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

A man who doesn't want to care for a child is a deadbeat.

A woman who doesn't want to is...pro choice.

This is all about perception at the surface and it's about population control more than anything. Social engineering is working at the full maximum here. It is seen by the elites that run this world, that men (who are without God) promote population with unbridled sex. It is seen that "men will be men" after all? (The old adage) In the past and even present, so many men would woo a woman, (women are flattered at the attention and give in) then men flee when she finds herself in an embarrassing pregnancy out of wedlock. So instead of teaching men (as the Apostle Paul would teach men to be) to be responsible lovers of God..to do the right thing by God and towards women, social engineers teach that it is ok to give into sexual lust and unbridled urges. They also teach that it is ok for women to comply if they want to engage in this activity and be degraded by the giving up of their bodies to sexual lusts and perversion outside of God ordained marriage. Pregnancy is considered to be a minor physical problem that can be "fixed" through abortion and call it "women's healthcare". That's just another way to dehumanize people to liken them to a cancerous tumor.

When a woman takes on the attitude of being "pro choice" it relieves men of their responsibility to support and raise up children. When the woman chooses to keep the child, the men who will not support the result of their sexual urges are seen as "deadbeat dads".

I'd say most of the world has succumbed to the social engineering of physical pleasures to think it is right to operate outside of God's perimeters. God put those perimeters in place for humanity to avoid this suffering. It is the unborn that gets sacrificed in this "holocaust" while men and women get on with life as usual.


Consider Margaret Sanger...the Founder of Planned Parenthood and all that she has to say about people and sex. Consider what Planned Parenthood is all about today. http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm