Most likely he was lying about it. Here's a question, why would one feel the need to lie about something like this? Is it that we have put such a premium on image that people feel they have to tell lies to maintain that image?
Why lie?
Who says he was lying just because he had a rental car keychain? I have a lot of keychains that have nothing to do with how I obtained my vehicle! LOL!
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
IDK, but my thinking would be, if I am going to buy a Cadillac -AND If I did not want anyone to think it was a rental--the first thing to do would be GET RID OF THE KEY CHAIN!!!
IDK, but my thinking would be, if I am going to buy a Cadillac -AND If I did not want anyone to think it was a rental--the first thing to do would be GET RID OF THE KEY CHAIN!!!
Or, on the transverse, if I were to buy a Cadillac but couldn't care less if anyone thought it was a rental then I might use the keychain that came free with the car.
Or, on the transverse, if I were to buy a Cadillac but couldn't care less if anyone thought it was a rental then I might use the keychain that came free with the car.
Or, on the transverse, if I were to buy a Cadillac but couldn't care less if anyone thought it was a rental then I might use the keychain that came free with the car.
But what you just said doesn't make much sense-
Because if you buy the Cadillac in the first place for image purposes you wouldn't keep the key chain.
Because if you buy the Cadillac in the first place for image purposes you wouldn't keep the key chain.
I guess that is point that I was making
Yes ma'am... I caught the point.
I was just offering the transverse.
One wouldn't necessarily buy a Cadillac for status although some/many very well might.
I would not prefer a Cadillac. I prefer the Lincoln Town Car and I like that car for its comfort, smooth ride and the track record of performance that I have experienced with that vehicle.
One day I would like to find a good used Mercedes to buy as well. Not for status but for the safety record of the vehicle as well as the nice ride that I would expect.
I have never driven one but should actual experience meet up with my expectations then I would see a good used Mercedes as a wise choice as long as there is a good maintenance record with it.
These vehicles can, indeed, be bought for status purposes but this is not always the case.
One wouldn't necessarily buy a Cadillac for status although some/many very well might.
I would not prefer a Cadillac. I prefer the Lincoln Town Car and I like that car for its comfort, smooth ride and the track record of performance that I have experienced with that vehicle.
One day I would like to find a good used Mercedes to buy as well. Not for status but for the safety record of the vehicle as well as the nice ride that I would expect.
I have never driven one but should actual experience meet up with my expectations then I would see a good used Mercedes as a wise choice as long as there is a good maintenance record with it.
These vehicles can, indeed, be bought for status purposes but this is not always the case.
Well I certainly agree people (or individuals) buy cars for the purpose of driving them and if they prefer to drive a luxury car it may not be for image sake but for a comfortable ride.
But if a church buys a Cadillac, umm makes me think they bought it for image sake--but that is my view. I understand that there are churches that send limousines to pick up their guest speakers. I believe it is all about image, and the image being perhaps, is that they believe God's people deserve the best- ( I am not saying that this is my view, but that of some ministries)
If a ministry does not espouse to that view (I am not saying it's right or wrong) why buy a Cadillac? Why not buy a van?? My husband and I have been escorted in Vans -- IDK.
Oh well makes for interesting dialog, and I am all about interesting dialog on AFF--(love it )
)
Linear Mode
