Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
I gave you a list of around 200 "transitional fossils" and you refused to even address it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...tional_fossils
That's less than 10% of just a single arbitrary list of "transitional fossils." Can you pick out, say 5? Can you pick out even a single one? coadie? 
Darwin was correct in his "prophecy," if that's what you want to call it. Darwin was right on the money!
Scientific theories are always falsifiable. Darwin offered a way for us to evaluate his theory and test it. That's not "religion." That's good science.
AND, the fact that you have never been able to even offer a single coherent "proof" to support your opposition to Evolutionary Biology actually reinforces Darwin's theory in the minds of others.
Now go back and look at those transitional forms and respond. |
So it is your religion.
Your articles of faith rely on "200" transitional fossils doing what you by faith believe they did. I remember you saying man evolved from a common ancestor if you accept the orthodox religion. That means he wasn't around when the primordial soup was brewed.
Your "reasoning" fails you. I have also not proven Buddha was not capable of miracles and by the same pathetic logic am I forced to accept that he did?
Just because you say so?
Threaded Mode
