What's Your Occupation?

Originally Posted by Newman

I am not interested in carrying on a conversation with someone's whose hostility is noted in the first sentence. Thanks anyway.

There you go attributing motives and attitudes again!

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Chan

There you go attributing motives and attitudes again!

What was your motive & attitude when you wrote that sentence?

Originally Posted by Subdued

What was your motive & attitude when you wrote that sentence?

I was simply reminding her that it is her typical behavior to try to tell people what their positions are without providing evidence but, yes, there was a bit of contempt (which is not the same as hostility) when I wrote it.

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Newman

I am not interested in carrying on a conversation with someone's whose hostility is noted in the first sentence. Thanks anyway.

Originally Posted by Chan

I was simply reminding her that it is her typical behavior to try to tell people what their positions are without providing evidence but, yes, there was a bit of contempt (which is not the same as hostility) when I wrote it.

So, Newman, are you interested in carrying on a conversation with someone whose contempt was noted in the first sentence?

[Newman]

Originally Posted by Subdued

So, Newman, are you interested in carrying on a conversation with someone whose contempt was noted in the first sentence?

Not today. I have a headache.

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Newman

Not today. I have a headache.

So be it.

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by Chan

I was simply reminding her that it is her typical behavior to try to tell people what their positions are without providing evidence but, yes, there was a bit of contempt (which is not the same as hostility) when I wrote it.

Do you have proof of the above statement?

Just wondering....

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

Do you have proof of the above statement?

Just wondering....

Let's start with some of her statements in this very thread:

I can't do it because you have posted more than 500 posts in 2 months tiime. I have no easy access to what you have posted prior, nor desire to carry this conversation further.

I stand at polar opposite of you on the status of women issues.

On the other hand; your posts on the forum are neither friendly (comparable to the way most folks have a conversation) nor persuasive BECAUSE you tend to ATTACK the person you are posting a response to.

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by Chan

Let's start with some of her statements in this very thread:

I can't do it because you have posted more than 500 posts in 2 months tiime.

You really want her to post evidence of that statement?

I have no easy access to what you have posted prior, nor desire to carry this conversation further.

This statement has nothing to do with anything you believe. It's just a statement and needs no proof of evidence.

I stand at polar opposite of you on the status of women issues.

Again, this needs no evidence, because regardless what you believe in regard to women issues, it's her opinion that she is opposite of you. No evidence needed.

On the other hand; your posts on the forum are neither friendly (comparable to the way most folks have a conversation) nor persuasive BECAUSE you tend to ATTACK the person you are posting a response to.

You want evidence of this? How about in the mouth of two or three witnesses? We already have that. About a dozen, at least.

All in all, it's still the opinion of another, and since when do opinions need facts? Having facts and evidence means it's no longer an opinion.

[A Cruce Salus]

Originally Posted by Subdued

What was your motive & attitude when you wrote that sentence?

Could not that same question be asked of many?