a honest question

[Sister Alvear]

Very sad the posted you mentioned...very sad indeed.

[Felicity]

I know that God is in control and that His will, purpose or plan will not be thwarted as a result of men deciding to walk a different and separate road apart from those who they've fellowshipped with and worked shoulder to shoulder with, who have prayed together, planned together and seen great things accomplished for the kingdom as a result of combined unified effort.

I know this. Anything yet that has split away from a movement that I believe was definitely put together by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost has not prospered or become anything that I personally would want to be part of.

One way we know that the UPCI was definitely started as a result of right spirit, motive and design is the way God blessed for several decades. The growth and the success speaks for itself. That started to change a couple decades or so ago and imo again ....... because of carnal reasoning and motive.

Not that everyone who walks away and decided to go a different way is carnal or has wrong or unholy motive, but certainly that has been a part of some of the unrest and unhappiness that has developed over the past 20 years or so.

I would to God this division wouldn't take place.

"Not my will but Thine be done" is the way we ought to pray of course, but I just wish and pray that MY will WOULD be done.

[Felicity]

Leaving in peace is one thing. What is happening presently goes a bit beyond that.

Most people including pastors are followers. Pastors are leaders, yes, most of them anyhow. But there are men among the UPCI membership who are leaders among leaders who are leading/driving this whole thing and what they're hoping develops goes beyond simply "leaving in peace" because they can't go along with a change that has taken place.

Gotta go eat my sandwich.

[Barb]

Originally Posted by Felicity

Leaving in peace is one thing. What is happening presently goes a bit beyond that.

Most people including pastors are followers. Pastors are leaders, yes, most of them anyhow. But there are men among the UPCI membership who are leaders among leaders who are leading/driving this whole thing and what they're hoping develops goes beyond simply "leaving in peace" because they can't go along with a change that has taken place.

Gotta go eat my sandwich.

Great posts here, girl...experience speaks.

The word that comes to my mind when reading lately is timing...my former pastor and others have been talking about leaving forever.

Some have been disgruntled with 'things' for years...

Why now?!

As a wise friend keeps telling me, "The issue is not always the issue!!"

[CC1]

Originally Posted by The Closer

i just got through looking at the larry booker thread and reading a little in it

we all know that no matter what the vote was in tampa this last year in the upc the organization was going to lose good men

with the vote being as it was the more conserative side was the one which has men leave

some of them have been accused of dividing the organization and so forth and such

you have been reading it so no need for me to go over it all again

but my question is what if the vote had been different and men from the more liberal side were choosing to leave would those men also be dividing the organization or would they be men of vision and desire to move the upc down the road

as i see it we cannot have it both ways

I think the answer to your question will be in how they handle it. If they have class and are gentlemen then I think everything will be fine.

If they rant and rave and trash the UPC then they are dead wrong.

[Coonskinner]

Originally Posted by The Closer

i just got through looking at the larry booker thread and reading a little in it

we all know that no matter what the vote was in tampa this last year in the upc the organization was going to lose good men

with the vote being as it was the more conserative side was the one which has men leave

some of them have been accused of dividing the organization and so forth and such

you have been reading it so no need for me to go over it all again

but my question is what if the vote had been different and men from the more liberal side were choosing to leave would those men also be dividing the organization or would they be men of vision and desire to move the upc down the road

as i see it we cannot have it both ways

You raise some interesting questions, Sis.

[Felicity]

What? There was a question? LOL.

[Felicity]

but my question is what if the vote had been different and men from the more liberal side were choosing to leave would those men also be dividing the organization or would they be men of vision and desire to move the upc down the road

• Depends on how you look at if of course as to how you answer the question, but you can't effectively affect or move anything if you're not in it.
  
  
• To me men of vision and desire to move the UPC down the road will stay in it and see that as it moves that important things stay front and center.
  
  
• Just leaving a group doesn't mean you're dividing it. You can create division by remaining in an organization if you're bucking leadership and the status quo with a bad attitude.
  
  
• I understand that people have to act on the courage of their conviction and according to their conscience, and there are times when there has to be a parting of ways.
  
  
• I guess I'm just in part asking people to consider the long term affect of the decision they make and to understand that the grass won't be greener on the other side.

Just a few thots.......