QUESTION: DId only 72 or 225 join WPF???????

[Monkeyman]

Greater than those nameless preachers who have died for this cause, greater than missionaries who give up comforts, nameless preachers in inner cities that face things we will NEVER know...that was one weird post man. And bro...the Head Cheese of UPC knows me, is proud of me, and not ashamed of me! *I feel like NYLP right now, heeeeeeeeeeee*

[Monkeyman]

Somebody call the Waaaahmbulance for this guy, sheesh!

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Monkeyman

Somebody call the Waaaahmbulance for this guy, sheesh!

Think he'd like a little cheese with that whine?

[RevDWW]

Sometimes silence is a great answer............


Sometimes if you ignore folks they will just go away........



Sometimes I just don't care who belongs to what........

[TRIPLE E]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Think he'd like a little cheese with that whine?

If he does somebody please get him some and quick!

[Thinking]

There was a powerful move of God in the general conference at Tampa...some say one of the best general conferences in many years. Did that signify God's approval on the United Pentecostal Church?

[StillStanding]

Originally Posted by Thinking

There was a powerful move of God in the general conference at Tampa...some say one of the best general conferences in many years. Did that signify God's approval on the United Pentecostal Church?

Here is a thread that was dedicated to talking about God's Approval.

God's Approval

[Nahum]

Here we go again.

I so appreciate those among us who really think we are so ignorant as to buy the absolute pack-o-l...ahem...I mean purposefully erroneous reports that they post.

Ahhhhh, it seems like only yesterday that I was being told that the 2006 meeting in Houston wasn't about a new org.

And then there were widespread claims that those fine, fine, fine upstanding purveyors of ethics and truth in charge of the Tulsa meeting had no intention of starting an org.

And now we are told that even though these same super-ethical men have organized, given their "fellowship" a name, formatted a charter, incorporated as a 501c3a and mapped a "better" future than the rest of us ever dreamed - THEY ARE STILL MOST HIGH, MOST HOLY, and MOST ETHICAL.

To which I say....um....whatever dude.

They have medication for that kind of thinking.

[stmatthew]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Here we go again.

I so appreciate those among us who really think we are so ignorant as to buy the absolute pack-o-l...ahem...I mean purposefully erroneous reports that they post.

Ahhhhh, it seems like only yesterday that I was being told that the 2006 meeting in Houston wasn't about a new org.

And then there were widespread claims that those fine, fine, fine upstanding purveyors of ethics and truth in charge of the Tulsa meeting had no intention of starting an org.

And now we are told that even though these same super-ethical men have organized, given their "fellowship" a name, formatted a charter, incorporated as a 501c3a and mapped a "better" future than the rest of us ever dreamed - THEY ARE STILL MOST HIGH, MOST HOLY, and MOST ETHICAL.

To which I say....um....whatever dude.

They have medication for that kind of thinking.

So I assume you consider AWCF to be an organization??

[bishoph]

Originally Posted by stmatthew

So I assume you consider AWCF to be an organization??

St. Matt, you ought to know by now that common sense and sound reasoning are rare commodities with regard to this debate. It seems to me that few (on both sides) are willing to be unbiased in their assessment of this situation.