Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC
Thad....what kind of question is that? You know I am UPC. I think there are those who opposed Res. 4 that would like to see what was described in the first post happen. They spout this stuff off as fact. Come on....advertising equates compromise?
I don't approve of the theology of the AOG. I wholeheartedly stand behind the doctrine of the UPC.
|
Television advertising equates COMMERCIALISM.
There was no need to consider Res# 4 to bring revival. It's like Simon Magus offering to buy the power to lay hands on people to receive the Holy Ghost. It is also like having John Maxwell teach ministers how to lead? John Maxwell teaches COMPANIES how to train their CEOs. Brother, take a step back because the wall is getting ready to fall.
Don't get me wrong I feel that the UPCI will continue and grow. I just think that with television you will get a high level of commercialism and secularism. Secularism in the sense that churches would gravitate closer to the Joel Olsteen mode of corporate churchanity.
Church is not a business nor is it run by charts and graphs.
Television may force those who are involved in it to compromise what they believe.
The UPCI will be walking into Trinitarian turf and may I remind you that the Trinitarians don't like Jesus Name One God theology, just ask Zondervan publishing.
Voting in Resolution 4 was a very bad call, that's just my opinion.
I think Christendom as a whole in this country is anemic and it's getting worse due to it trying its best to become user friendly. I have warned Brothers who wanted to re-think holiness that they were heading down the road that will only prosper a wallet and not the souls of those they preach to.
Television is wrong and time proves all things, so lets see what happens.
Watch and see how it all unravels or congeals.
In Jesus name
Brother Benincasa
www.OnTimeJournal.com