IAM has met WHOLEHEARTED!!!

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Interesting. Very interesting.

Pass that this way, please. With more butter and a large Diet Coke.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by rrford

Pass that this way, please. With more butter and a large Diet Coke.

Buttered popcorn and DIET Coke? Think about the irony.

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Buttered popcorn and DIET Coke? Think about the irony.

lol

[IAintMovin]

Originally Posted by josh

For what it's worth:

IAM, the opening thread that Dan posted certainly left me with the impression that the whole meeting was a matter of humor to you and Dan. Since the reason for the "laughing till you puke" comment was not given, we can only assume that it had something to do with the general attitude towards WH. I mean, Dan definitely assumed that those doing the jibing would find great humor in the meeting for SOME reason.

Add your lack of defense of WH in this thread to the mix and you'll see that OP made a reasonable assumption...

As to the con/lib definitions, I don't know you but I do see that you make it clear that you distance yourself from those on this forum that bear the label "con" or "ultra-con". How else, in the context of WH, would a person label you???

Anyway, not trying to stir things up or to say that any of us have guessed right or wrong....I just want you to see the impression that has been left upon a reader who doesn't know you or WH.

How much effort would it take to clear things up???

I guess you can read into a post what you desire to read......if you had been there, which you were not.....if you had been as NLYP said, "on the phone"....which you were not.....you would know that what made this funny is that I was the only one hearing all the comments........and it was just funny that NLYP called while WH stepped up to meet me.......if I remember correctly there really were no "negative" comments, it was just funny the way it happened.....

Now as to the label........call me what you desire.......I am doing my best to be a Child of God and live for Him....that is really all I care about....I have been in both camps at different times in my life......carried the banners and the whole nine yards....tried to please those on both sides......now I really dont care what label you put on me......I just want to do his will.....

Now as to the defense of WH.....if you will go back and read.....I had NOTHING to do with the "attack" the comments about his wife and her clothing or any of those things........I did not realize that it was my place to take up for him or the topic at hand.......especially since I have never met her that I know of.......and by the way....I didnt see you taking up for anybody either if my memory serves me correctly.........

Now if you will kindly bow out of a conversation that was between OP and myself......go get popcorn and become like the rest of the watchers...........

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by IAintMovin

I guess you can read into a post what you desire to read......if you had been there, which you were not.....if you had been as NLYP said, "on the phone"....which you were not.....you would know that what made this funny is that I was the only one hearing all the comments........and it was just funny that NLYP called while WH stepped up to meet me.......if I remember correctly there really were no "negative" comments, it was just funny the way it happened.....

Now as to the label........call me what you desire.......I am doing my best to be a Child of God and live for Him....that is really all I care about....I have been in both camps at different times in my life......carried the banners and the whole nine yards....tried to please those on both sides......now I really dont care what label you put on me......I just want to do his will.....

Now as to the defense of WH.....if you will go back and read.....I had NOTHING to do with the "attack" the comments about his wife and her clothing or any of those things........I did not realize that it was my place to take up for him or the topic at hand.......especially since I have never met her that I know of.......and by the way....I didnt see you taking up for anybody either if my memory serves me correctly.........

Now if you will kindly bow out of a conversation that was between OP and myself......go get popcorn and become like the rest of the watchers...........

Always a gentleman that is what I like.

[josh]

Originally Posted by IAintMovin

I guess you can read into a post what you desire to read......if you had been there, which you were not.....if you had been as NLYP said, "on the phone"....which you were not.....you would know that what made this funny is that I was the only one hearing all the comments........and it was just funny that NLYP called while WH stepped up to meet me.......if I remember correctly there really were no "negative" comments, it was just funny the way it happened.....

Now as to the label........call me what you desire.......I am doing my best to be a Child of God and live for Him....that is really all I care about....I have been in both camps at different times in my life......carried the banners and the whole nine yards....tried to please those on both sides......now I really dont care what label you put on me......I just want to do his will.....

Now as to the defense of WH.....if you will go back and read.....I had NOTHING to do with the "attack" the comments about his wife and her clothing or any of those things........I did not realize that it was my place to take up for him or the topic at hand.......especially since I have never met her that I know of.......and by the way....I didnt see you taking up for anybody either if my memory serves me correctly.........

Now if you will kindly bow out of a conversation that was between OP and myself......go get popcorn and become like the rest of the watchers...........

How disingenuous, Iam. If posters had to wait for an invitation to join conversations or to offer opinions your forum would die a quick death.

You can obfuscate if you like, I merely pointed out that the whole thread started with, and continued with, the point that you meeting with WH was a matter of humor...a matter of humor which degenerated into ridicule of WH.

Perhaps I read into it that the humor was at WH's expense. Obviously, you don't care what I read into it.

Carry on...

[rgcraig]

Hey, check out today's Encouraging Word:

Saturday, May 5

Respect everyone, and love your Christian brothers and sisters. Fear God, and respect the king.

1 Peter 2:17 NLT

[NLYP]

Originally Posted by IAintMovin

Thank you but I did re-read and post 83 WH quotes me in what I had written while viewing the first three pages of this thread, post 84 you quoting him and it was in direct reference to our meeting and that dear brother is the post I quoted when I wrote the post that hit a little too close to home it seems.

Yes there are shots taken at WH, but again none by me........it appeared to me that you were making reference to his and my meeting when you stated that this is what happens when a lib meets a con...........sorry bro but the old turn the tables once you have been called on somethign will not work this time.........

Again I am glad you post here and I enjoy many of your post......but if you think that it did not appear that the shot was taken at me......then sir you are the one that is blind.




God bless

Bravo....meistro Bravo!!!!

[NLYP]

Originally Posted by josh

For what it's worth:

IAM, the opening thread that Dan posted certainly left me with the impression that the whole meeting was a matter of humor to you and Dan. Since the reason for the "laughing till you puke" comment was not given, we can only assume that it had something to do with the general attitude towards WH. I mean, Dan definitely assumed that those doing the jibing would find great humor in the meeting for SOME reason.

Add your lack of defense of WH in this thread to the mix and you'll see that OP made a reasonable assumption...

As to the con/lib definitions, I don't know you but I do see that you make it clear that you distance yourself from those on this forum that bear the label "con" or "ultra-con". How else, in the context of WH, would a person label you???

Anyway, not trying to stir things up or to say that any of us have guessed right or wrong....I just want you to see the impression that has been left upon a reader who doesn't know you or WH.

How much effort would it take to clear things up???

Josh..PLEASE dont tangle with IAM...you will walk over...and you will limp away.
He is one of if not my absolute best friends. Dont label him or judge him without knowing him.
He will swing a blade at you and you wont even know you are cut until you turn your head and it falls off.
Just a word of caution.

[NLYP]

Originally Posted by josh

How disingenuous, Iam. If posters had to wait for an invitation to join conversations or to offer opinions your forum would die a quick death.

You can obfuscate if you like, I merely pointed out that the whole thread started with, and continued with, the point that you meeting with WH was a matter of humor...a matter of humor which degenerated into ridicule of WH.

Perhaps I read into it that the humor was at WH's expense. Obviously, you don't care what I read into it.

Carry on...

Wrong oh might judge of man. What was humorous is the fact that WH and I have a history and It was hilarious that he and I am were together at the same moment I called IAM.
checkmate.