Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2007, 09:16 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
I am only as versed as I study each case. If it was masculine or feminine it would still be "She will be" or "He will be". It's still more of a mindset than putting on an article of clothing, only, IMHO.

It reaches further with abomination in the passage.
not really, not if the translation is "if she will be clothed with mens clothing" etc etc etc
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:40 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Uh. Hayah is the Hebrew word used for I AM that I AM in our english bibles...weird that it would be translated wear. Did the woman leave and not come back? I think it is the dumbest thing for a preacher to approach standards and clothing like that when you have new people sitting there (or any other time)...Im sure they did not come to church to be called a prostitute in front of a bunch of strangers

On that verse Keil and Delitzsch say
Deu_22:5
As the property of a neighbour was to be sacred in the estimation of an Israelite, so also the divine distinction of the sexes, which was kept sacred in civil life by the clothing peculiar to each sex, was to be not less but even more sacredly observed. “There shall not be man's things upon a woman, and a man shall not put on a woman's clothes.” כּלי does not signify clothing merely, nor arms only, but includes every kind of domestic and other utensils (as in Exo_22:6; Lev_11:32; Lev_13:49). The immediate design of this prohibition was not to prevent licentiousness, or to oppose idolatrous practices (the proofs which Spencer has adduced of the existence of such usages among heathen nations are very far-fetched); but to maintain the sanctity of that distinction of the sexes which was established by the creation of man and woman, and in relation to which Israel was not to sin. Every violation or wiping out of this distinction - such even, for example, as the emancipation of a woman - was unnatural, and therefore an abomination in the sight of God.
--------------
Probably the translation should mean then "there shall not be on" or "no clothing pertaining to a man will be on" or something to that effect. So to translate this as wear is a bad translation, not that it really matters for the meaning
Wives are slaves??


Maybe the Mormons have something!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:43 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
Wives are slaves??


Maybe the Mormons have something!
Yeah, something you don't - more than one wife!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:47 PM
COOPER's Avatar
COOPER COOPER is offline
Hello AFF!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Yeah, something you don't - more than one wife!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:50 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by COOPER View Post
Put on your Wranglers and take a ride, Cowboy!

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:47 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Yeah, something you don't - more than one wife!!!
Just think, one can clean, one can do laundry, one can, fix food, one can massage your sore muscles....


Hey, there is one Mormon church in town here and they dress conservatively too!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:50 PM
COOPER's Avatar
COOPER COOPER is offline
Hello AFF!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
Just think, one can clean, one can do laundry, one can, fix food, one can massage your sore muscles....


Hey, there is one Mormon church in town here and they dress conservatively too!
Where do they all sleep?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:51 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
Just think, one can clean, one can do laundry, one can, fix food, one can massage your sore muscles....


Hey, there is one Mormon church in town here and they dress conservatively too!
Your ...... is kinda scary!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:50 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron View Post
Wives are slaves??


Maybe the Mormons have something!
Actually they were seen as property back then...ah those were the grand old days. It didn't matter if she loved you or not
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-11-2007, 08:54 PM
Ron's Avatar
Ron Ron is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Actually they were seen as property back then...ah those were the grand old days. It didn't matter if she loved you or not

Yup! Remember King David.

Wooo Boy. If the King was upset, he just put his wife away!!


I wonder If I could get used to being called your Majesty?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What was the UPCI "Philippines Fiasco" that Took Place in the late 1980s??? StillStanding Fellowship Hall 47 02-04-2008 10:09 PM
News Report On "Snake Handling & Speaking In Tongue" CC1 Fellowship Hall 100 06-05-2007 09:37 PM
Anthony Mangun Just Said the "T" word! CC1 Fellowship Hall 26 04-02-2007 10:51 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Costeon

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.