Quote:
Originally Posted by tv1a
I'm not suggesting anyone owes me anything. When one expects a quality post from someone who has been know to provide in the past, one has a sense of letdown when a post has less substance than tofu. The rant and rave crowd gets a thrill from it.
Which is worse? Someone who presents data with an agenda or an organization who supresses the data that suggest history isn't as accurate as desired?
|
That supposed lack of substance has now garnered almost 700 posts!
As to your last question, neither is preferable. Your question must be rhetorical.
Coonskinner stated his opinion. That's all. And so far we've had many more
"easy believism" posters on this thread that freaky-conservatives.