I'm not suggesting anyone owes me anything. When one expects a quality post from someone who has been know to provide in the past, one has a sense of letdown when a post has less substance than tofu. The rant and rave crowd gets a thrill from it.
Which is worse? Someone who presents data with an agenda or an organization who supresses the data that suggest history isn't as accurate as desired?
Quote:
Originally Posted by apersimmon
To be disappointed implies he has ANY sense of being obligated to you, or that you have any capacity to overview his thinking or expression. That's ridiculous. Who are you to be 'disappointed' in another person's post as if they have some responsibility to you? tv1a, isn't this really a subtle manipulation, when you say you are 'disappointed'?
|
Threaded Mode
