Quote:
Originally Posted by Maple Leaf
This thread has validity.
Dr. Vaughn has asserted to this board that he has a legitimate doctoral degree from a recognized university. The claim to a doctorate in theology is consciously, or subconciously, a factor in every theological discussion that he is involved in on this board.
If the claim to a Regent University degree is bogus, so is the poster making the claim.
Anonymity on these forums has been a part of the process since the earliest days of the Apostolic Internet. The purpose of an anonymous user name is so that the question is answered rather than the questioner.
This thread is not prying into the subject's personal life, but is requesting verification of a part of "Dr Vaughn's" public persona, a part that he interjected into public discourse when he chose to be identified as a Dr. He could have adopted a generic user name, and, if he had, we wouldn't be reading this amusing thread.
|
I let DV know he brought a lot of this questioning upon himself because of his username. I suggested he talk with admin about changing it. He's going to attract a lot of attention, with or without the "Dr", because of his Branhamite leanings. Dan Alicea already raked him over the coals over his credentials on another thread. What is the point of creating a new screen name just to do the same thing?