Quick Dr. Vaughn - Get on the Phone, U been Robbed

[Maple Leaf]

This thread has validity.

Dr. Vaughn has asserted to this board that he has a legitimate doctoral degree from a recognized university. The claim to a doctorate in theology is consciously, or subconciously, a factor in every theological discussion that he is involved in on this board.

If the claim to a Regent University degree is bogus, so is the poster making the claim.

Anonymity on these forums has been a part of the process since the earliest days of the Apostolic Internet. The purpose of an anonymous user name is so that the question is answered rather than the questioner.

This thread is not prying into the subject's personal life, but is requesting verification of a part of "Dr Vaughn's" public persona, a part that he interjected into public discourse when he chose to be identified as a Dr. He could have adopted a generic user name, and, if he had, we wouldn't be reading this amusing thread.

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Maple Leaf

This thread has validity.

Dr. Vaughn has asserted to this board that he has a legitimate doctoral degree from a recognized university. The claim to a doctorate in theology is consciously, or subconciously, a factor in every theological discussion that he is involved in on this board.

If the claim to a Regent University degree is bogus, so is the poster making the claim.

Anonymity on these forums has been a part of the process since the earliest days of the Apostolic Internet. The purpose of an anonymous user name is so that the question is answered rather than the questioner.

This thread is not prying into the subject's personal life, but is requesting verification of a part of "Dr Vaughn's" public persona, a part that he interjected into public discourse when he chose to be identified as a Dr. He could have adopted a generic user name, and, if he had, we wouldn't be reading this amusing thread.

I let DV know he brought a lot of this questioning upon himself because of his username. I suggested he talk with admin about changing it. He's going to attract a lot of attention, with or without the "Dr", because of his Branhamite leanings. Dan Alicea already raked him over the coals over his credentials on another thread. What is the point of creating a new screen name just to do the same thing?

[Maple Leaf]

Originally Posted by Rico

I let DV know he brought a lot of this questioning upon himself because of his username. I suggested he talk with admin about changing it. He's going to attract a lot of attention, with or without the "Dr", because of his Branhamite leanings. Dan Alicea already raked him over the coals over his credentials on another thread. What is the point of creating a new screen name just to do the same thing?

In my world, a doctoral degree from Regent University carries a significant amount of weight. When the good doctor's claim to a wide variety of degrees from online universities and longtime friends proved to lack credibility, he appealed to his Regent degree for the credibility that the University of PO Box 777 lacked.

This thread claims proof that he doesn't have a Regent degree.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Maple Leaf

In my world, a doctoral degree from Regent University carries a significant amount of weight. When the good doctor's claim to a wide variety of degrees from online universities and longtime friends proved to lack credibility, he appealed to his Regent degree for the credibility that the University of PO Box 777 lacked.

This thread claims proof that he doesn't have a Regent degree.

So, what do we do with that little tidbit of information?

Forgive and forget?

Ask him to change his username?

Orrrrrrrrr, do we spend our time discussing various other issues, such as shoes, politics, baseball and such?

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

So, what do we do with that little tidbit of information?

Forgive and forget?

Ask him to change his username?

Orrrrrrrrr, do we spend our time discussing various other issues, such as shoes, politics, baseball and such?

Yes...lets talk about shoes!!!

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Sassy

Yes...lets talk about shoes!!!

Don't sass me!

Originally Posted by Berkeley

Don't sass me!

ooops...did I run over your toe?

[Maple Leaf]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

So, what do we do with that little tidbit of information?

Forgive and forget?

Ask him to change his username?

Orrrrrrrrr, do we spend our time discussing various other issues, such as shoes, politics, baseball and such?

Unchallenged, Dr Vaughn spoke as a scholar, and his incredible achievements gave an unwarranted credibility to the views of William Branham.

The words of a Regent scholar carry a weight that the words of an Internet scholar with no credential beyond a modem, keyboard, and time on their hands does not carry.

If he is a fraud, his words in support of William Branham actually cast a shadow over the teachings of his apostle. Truth does not need falsehood to buttress its claims.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Rico

I let DV know he brought a lot of this questioning upon himself because of his username. I suggested he talk with admin about changing it. He's going to attract a lot of attention, with or without the "Dr", because of his Branhamite leanings. Dan Alicea already raked him over the coals over his credentials on another thread. What is the point of creating a new screen name just to do the same thing?

Why do you care?

Who appointed you forum policeman?

And, you DO NOT KNOW for sure that Deep Threat is Daniel.

Maybe you should stop with the accusations until you verify your assumptions, hmm?

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Who appointed you forum policeman?

The same person who appointed you the Haman of AFF.