What is remarkable is just a few short years ago nobody had even heard the word "Preterist".
Now Preterism (full and Partial) are widely known of and openly discussed, and accepted to a degree.
Along with the same "remarkableness" is "Dispensationalism" too is being questioned, and rejected by one time stalwerts of it, at least in the traditonal view of it.
Is this all good? Healthy or irrelevent?
Is the current Christian generation not as tied to tradition therefore, a open re-evaluation is not a problem?
Or is it a sign of something or other?
Remarkable!
To accept full preterism is to me a sign people have lost the love of the truth. They destroy THE most important thing we have to offer. The hope of the coming of Jesus Christ.
To accept full preterism is to me a sign people have lost the love of the truth. They destroy THE most important thing we have to offer. The hope of the coming of Jesus Christ.
Yes, I'm sure you're right. They love the truth for a while, then stop. Then they look around and say "Hmmm, that preterism thing looks wrong. Yeah, wrong, so I think I'll believe it!"
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
To accept full preterism is to me a sign people have lost the love of the truth. They destroy THE most important thing we have to offer. The hope of the coming of Jesus Christ.
So that hope is only a hope for those living at the actual time?
It is not considered hope that one in the grave would forever be with their Lord?
Why is it a loss of hope when someones belief says that the very same resurrection will happen for all those who are saved by His grace when they pass from this life?
So that hope is only a hope for those living at the actual time?
It is not considered hope that one in the grave would forever be with their Lord?
Why is it a loss of hope when someones belief says that the very same resurrection will happen for all those who are saved by His grace when they pass from this life?
Why does that totally undo that hope?
Because it is not true that one has immediate eternal life at death. The resurrection of the dead will take place at the second coming of Jesus.
Because it is not true that one has immediate eternal life at death. The resurrection of the dead will take place at the second coming of Jesus.
Is this the second coming you refer to? Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
Bro. MB has asked me to discuss it but I just read and read but for some reason I just cannot get a clear picture...and nothing at all against MB...to me he has been a perfect gentleman...it is just the doctrine I cannot seem to understand.
__________________
Monies to help us may be sent to P.O. Box 797, Jonesville, La 71343.
If it is for one of our direct needs please mark it on the check.
Facebook Janice LaVaun Taylor Alvear
Hybrid Mode
