Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 02-16-2013, 03:49 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Something interesting about gays.

ISBE
Flesh in the sense of carnal nature (σάρκικος, sárkikos, “carnal”; the King James Version uses sarkinós in Rom_7:14). Human nature, being inferior to the spiritual, is to be in subjection to it. If man refuses to be under this higher law, and as a free agent permits the lower nature to gain an ascendancy over the spirit, the “flesh” becomes a revolting force (Gen_6:3, Gen_6:12; Joh_1:13; Rom_7:14; 1Co_3:1, 1Co_3:3; Col_2:18; 1Jo_2:16). Thus, the fleshly or carnal mind, i.e. a mind in subjection to carnal nature, is opposed to the Divine spirit, who alone is a sufficient corrective, Christ having secured for us the power of overcoming (Rom_8:3), if we manifest a deep desire and an earnest endeavor to overcome (Gal_5:17, Gal_5:18).
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
  #202  
Old 02-16-2013, 05:44 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,829
Re: Something interesting about gays.

The question about Jesus is not a red herring but is Berg applicable in that if what you are saying is true that a man must have a carnal/flesh/sinful nature under to be tempted then your are saying that since Jesus was tempted He posses such a nature but if you say He did not have a carnal/flesh/sinful nature and was still tempted then you are admitting your argument is wrong! The reason you refuse to answer my question is not because it is a red herring but because you can't without destroying your own argument!!!

As to our flesh/carnal nature not being the same as a sinful nature if that is your belief you cannot use Romans 7 when you notice how Paul describes that which fights in these verses:
Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

To say say that Paul taught simple overcomeing instead of complete removal of our sinful/carnal/flesh nature in Romans 7&8 mames no sense. Let me illustrate my point as it applies to Romans 7 and 8. In romans 7 we are told by Paul in verse 21 22 23 that what he struggled with was a law of sin. In Romans 8:2 Paul that the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made him free from the law of sin and death.

Now by way of illustration lets substitute the word CHAIN for the phrase LAW OF SIN we would then find Paul saying he was bound by a CHIAN in chapter 7 and freed from a CHAIN in chapter 8. To say therefore that Paul meant he was given the power to overcome and resist the CHAIN but not have it removed would be the same as saying that by loosening the CHAIN to where you could hobble around was freedom. Such an idea makes no sense! If someone is bound by a chain and them set free it means the chain was removed from them and in no longer on them! In just the same way when Paul says he was freed from from the law of sin that he speaks of struggleing with in chapter 7 it means the same thing that it was removed and he no longer had it! Otherwise why did he not say " the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath helped me with the law of sin and death rather than freed me from the law of sin and death.
  #203  
Old 02-17-2013, 08:15 AM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,829
Re: Something interesting about gays.

No response huh? It is a tough question.
  #204  
Old 02-17-2013, 12:23 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,829
Re: Something interesting about gays.

Why is it that no one will respond to that comment?
  #205  
Old 02-17-2013, 12:41 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Something interesting about gays.

Because I can't follow your post. Something to do with the way you articulate.
  #206  
Old 02-17-2013, 01:53 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,829
Re: Something interesting about gays.

Lol yeah sometimes I go back and reread a post and see slot of typos.
  #207  
Old 02-17-2013, 01:53 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Something interesting about gays.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
The question about Jesus is not a red herring but is Berg applicable in that if what you are saying is true that a man must have a carnal/flesh/sinful nature under to be tempted then your are saying that since Jesus was tempted He posses such a nature but if you say He did not have a carnal/flesh/sinful nature and was still tempted then you are admitting your argument is wrong! The reason you refuse to answer my question is not because it is a red herring but because you can't without destroying your own argument!!!

As to our flesh/carnal nature not being the same as a sinful nature if that is your belief you cannot use Romans 7 when you notice how Paul describes that which fights in these verses:
Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

To say say that Paul taught simple overcomeing instead of complete removal of our sinful/carnal/flesh nature in Romans 7&8 mames no sense. Let me illustrate my point as it applies to Romans 7 and 8. In romans 7 we are told by Paul in verse 21 22 23 that what he struggled with was a law of sin. In Romans 8:2 Paul that the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made him free from the law of sin and death.

Now by way of illustration lets substitute the word CHAIN for the phrase LAW OF SIN we would then find Paul saying he was bound by a CHIAN in chapter 7 and freed from a CHAIN in chapter 8. To say therefore that Paul meant he was given the power to overcome and resist the CHAIN but not have it removed would be the same as saying that by loosening the CHAIN to where you could hobble around was freedom. Such an idea makes no sense! If someone is bound by a chain and them set free it means the chain was removed from them and in no longer on them! In just the same way when Paul says he was freed from from the law of sin that he speaks of struggleing with in chapter 7 it means the same thing that it was removed and he no longer had it! Otherwise why did he not say " the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath helped me with the law of sin and death rather than freed me from the law of sin and death.
As I said before, I did not say sin nature. I said flesh nature. Jesus had a flesh nature. He was truly human so he had a flesh nature. He did not have a sin nature
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
  #208  
Old 02-17-2013, 01:54 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Something interesting about gays.

fallacy of equivocation. Strawman argument
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
  #209  
Old 02-17-2013, 02:55 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,829
Re: Something interesting about gays.

Please show me the difference of a sin nature and a flesh nature in the Bible. Also when did man first get a flesh nature and how does a flesh nature affect us (just in case we are actually talking about different things)?

You also did not respond to my illustration showing that whatever it was that Paul was struggling with in Romans 7 is removed in chapter 8.
  #210  
Old 02-18-2013, 01:43 AM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Something interesting about gays.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
Please show me the difference of a sin nature and a flesh nature in the Bible. Also when did man first get a flesh nature and how does a flesh nature affect us (just in case we are actually talking about different things)?

You also did not respond to my illustration showing that whatever it was that Paul was struggling with in Romans 7 is removed in chapter 8.
Show me sin nature and flesh nature in the bible...
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gays and Children Dedicated Mind Fellowship Hall 119 11-24-2010 06:31 PM
Gays In the Church Dedicated Mind Fellowship Hall 46 10-20-2010 10:10 PM
To Those Who Make Fun of Gays..... Mr. Smith Fellowship Hall 90 10-02-2010 12:43 PM
This Shocked Me - JTS to allow gays Guy The Newsroom 96 04-16-2007 10:47 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.