New "Apostolic" Bible

[LifeUncommon]

I believe you can find it by doing a quick Amazin search on "Pharisee Bible".

The "Apostolic Bible" is alarming and saddening. Slipped right down the slope.

[LifeUncommon]

Originally Posted by hometown guy

Kjv bible is as apostolic as it gets.

Silly goose! They don't mean Apostolic as in the Apostles. They mean apostolic as in their denomination. Huge (and hugely important) difference.

But I agree with you.

[Dedicated Mind]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Why doesn't Segraves count? How about French? How about Norris? Kinsey? Have you been through the Alpha Course?

i said segraves and dkb had the only academic books on pph. i was wrong, kinsey has one on ephesians, norris has one on oneness and your friend modarelli has one on church history and one on greek. wow! where are the ep sanders, nt wrights, james dg dunns, jurgen moltmans, paul tillichs on systematic theology, nt theology, jesus vs judaism, paul vs judaism, paul vs roman empire, prophecy, hermeneutics, response to liberation theology, significance of the kingdom of god like ladd, role of church in society etc? what is the alpha course, not on pph. got a link?

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Sam

My memory (among other things) is not what it used to be.

Was there a thread on here a few months ago about a new "Apostolic" Bible that was not really a new Bible but just the KJV with Matthew 28:19 changed from "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" to "in my name"?

I seem to remember reading about it but I'm not sure if it was here or on some other forum.

If it was here, could someone give me a link to that thread?

Thank you

the link is www.apostolic-bible.com

There is a Free Gospel of Matthew for those interested in seeing a sample of the Holy Apostolic Bible (HAB).
It has a Jesus Name Appendix with updated information about the Name of Jesus in Matthew 28:19

[Jenny]

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind

this has to be a joke. is there even any apostolics that speak greek or hebrew? why don't we see any commentaries from pph unless they are dkb or segraves? i don't see any academic production from pph someone please enlighten me.

After you asked this question, Word Aflame Press put out the Apostolic Study Bible, King James Version. I bought a copy and have enjoyed the notes. It seems to be really helpful, and it does not twist the Scriptures or reword anything like that so-called "Apostolic" Bible. The contributors seem to have impressive credentials. But I imagine you have seen this Bible and know all this by now. What did you think of it?

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Jenny

After you asked this question, Word Aflame Press put out the Apostolic Study Bible, King James Version. I bought a copy and have enjoyed the notes. It seems to be really helpful, and it does not twist the Scriptures or reword anything like that so-called "Apostolic" Bible. The contributors seem to have impressive credentials. But I imagine you have seen this Bible and know all this by now. What did you think of it?

Where does "The Holy Apostolic Bible" twist the scriptures? can you show some examples?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Where does "The Holy Apostolic Bible" twist the scriptures? can you show some examples?

Isn't that the Bible that has in Acts 2:38 "Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of the Father, the Son, and The Holy Spirit?"

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Isn't that the Bible that has in Acts 2:38 "Repent and be baptized everyone of you in the name of the Father, the Son, and The Holy Spirit?"

Ha ha ha you are funny.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Ha ha ha you are funny.

I thought you would like that.

But seriously this past Friday I was in a discussion with a Jehovah Witness who walked up to a Bible study I was conducting. He asked if he could ask questions and I said sure. To make a long story short he ended up telling me that the original New Testament in the book of Acts the titles father, son, and holy spirit in all passages where it said Jesus name. Anyway, he got all flustered when I asked him if the New World Translation was the best English translation? I then asked if the New World Translation straightens everything which was incorrect in other translations to bring it closet to the original? He replied "of course!" I then asked "then why doesn't it say father, son, and holy spirit in Acts 2:38 if that what it said in the original? He then trooped off to join his wandering away group.

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

I thought you would like that.

But seriously this past Friday I was in a discussion with a Jehovah Witness who walked up to a Bible study I was conducting. He asked if he could ask questions and I said sure. To make a long story short he ended up telling me that the original New Testament in the book of Acts the titles father, son, and holy spirit in all passages where it said Jesus name. Anyway, he got all flustered when I asked him if the New World Translation was the best English translation? I then asked if the New World Translation straightens everything which was incorrect in other translations to bring it closet to the original? He replied "of course!" I then asked "then why doesn't it say father, son, and holy spirit in Acts 2:38 if that what it said in the original? He then trooped off to join his wandering away group.