Ron - question for you

[Ron]

Originally Posted by returnman

This is not what the thread was intended but a lot of things political point back to the media. I'm pulling back more and more of daily viewing. Have for the most part been a Fox viewer with occasion of the more fake media just for flavor. Lot is being said about NewsMax and ONAN or whatever it is. My wife's hair dresser confronted her about not watching NewsMax like it was a condition of her salvation. Let's not leave out the switching to "Parler" vs facebook. Major announcements lately on that. LOL. I care nothing about getting on a 24/7 rant whether I agree or not. Not sure where I was going but thbelieve the tide will turn I have to say about it for now.

I kind of agree with you, Trump is right it is a lying fake news media and it isn't just towards politics. I am praying against all things Covid 19, real and imagined. The Church doesn't need to be tied up, but we have a kingdom to build for Christ by winning souls and discipling them. This is all a distraction from what God wants to do. I believe the tide will turn and Gods will in the end will prevail, and work to those who stand in the way.
That being said, my posts are not only discussions, but a way to vent as I tried venting to the family, and myself and they would have none of it, though they agree with me. Except myself sometimes.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Ron

Actually, I remember when this happened. Jagmeet Singh is the leader of the New Democratic Party. Kind of like your Democrats. He was speaking on systemic racism in the RCMP, the Quebec caucus of the Quebecois party, only found in Quebec, wouldn't agree to his statement and therefore give what he said unanimous consent to move on and be debated. He then called them Racist.
Now in the House of Commons where debate takes place and legislation is passed, members are shielded from lible laws to foster open debate. Open debate doesn't mean that one cannot make remarks that are unparliamentary.That is where the speaker comes in, one can appeal to the speaker saying the member said an unparliamentary remark. The speaker then will ask the member to withdraw it and apologize, most do, because the damage has already been done. The member will be given several opportunities to do so but if he doesn't he can be ejected by the speaker for the day or until he apologizes. Most members who have had unparliamentary statements made to them in the House if Commons will try and goad the one who said the statement through a media interview to try and get the member to repeat the statement knowing there is no protection from libel laws outside of Parliament.

Q Beckers are racists

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by returnman

This is not what the thread was intended but a lot of things political point back to the media. I'm pulling back more and more of daily viewing. Have for the most part been a Fox viewer with occasion of the more fake media just for flavor. Lot is being said about NewsMax and ONAN or whatever it is. My wife's hair dresser confronted her about not watching NewsMax like it was a condition of her salvation. Let's not leave out the switching to "Parler" vs facebook. Major announcements lately on that. LOL. I care nothing about getting on a 24/7 rant whether I agree or not. Not sure where I was going but this what I have to say about it for now.

That's why Pentecostal preachers preached against television.

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Q Beckers are racists

It's pronounced Kaybeckers. Even French in France say they butchered the French language.