Mocking those that don't practice the same "liberties" as you...

[Elihu]

Originally Posted by freeatlast

I think what waas viewed aas "profane" was sombody saying that maybe God would and could hear the prayers of a bobbed hair women.

Not actually any four letter words.

And you all said that libs don't mock anyone?

[Elihu]

Originally Posted by AtlantaBishop

Surely you are better than this? Everybody has some kind of standard - just because some do not adhere to the Wesleyan model does not mean that they do not have ANY standard. There is no reason to act ignorant on here.

Hilarious!

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by freeatlast

I think what waas viewed aas "profane" was sombody saying that maybe God would and could hear the prayers of a bobbed hair women.

Not actually any four letter words.

How many Angels then fit on the tip of a bobby pin?

[ThePastorsCoach]

Originally Posted by shamgar1

Here is what you said.

.

You are implying God has no moral absolutes.
That is moral relativism and humanism at its finest!

Dude - you are wrong - Just because YOU think this does not mean it is true!
He did not say what you think he is saying!

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by shamgar1

Consider the responses on this thread alone. Most of these posters are hostile to conservatives. They go ballistic when the very word 'standard' is used.

God couldn't possibly demand holiness, could He?

Hey darlin'....I'd like to request ONE thing from you. Could you at least use the term "a few libs"? All this talk of "51%" and "most of the libs", etc. is really way off base.

What truly astonishes me is how is seems the "true holy ones" are the first ones that can't take the heat. Of all people, it seems that their complete understanding of being Christ-like should give them enough Holy Ghost unction to turn the other cheek and love the unlovable, but what do I know just about every day I read that I'm going to hell.

[freeatlast]

Originally Posted by shamgar1

And you all said that libs don't mock anyone?

Please tell me where I said that Shamgar1

[Elihu]

Originally Posted by AtlantaBishop

Dude - you are wrong - Just because YOU think this does not mean it is true!
He did not say what you think he is saying!

Wrong would imply that there is a right way to think about something. My liberty allows me to feel he said is what I think he said, because actually there are no absolutes.

So you see, you are not wrong to call me wrong, because that is your perspective. But I am not wrong to say Pragmatist is wrong because that is my perspective. I choose what is wrong - or right - as the case may be, based on how I feel at any given moment. That is my right as an individual.

You should allow me the option of being right or wrong, regardless of your personal feelings of my rightness or wrongness.

In that way, I am truly at my Christian liberty.

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

What truly astonishes me is how is seems the "true holy ones" are the first ones that can't take the heat. Of all people, it seems that their complete understanding of being Christ-like should give them enough Holy Ghost unction to turn the other cheek and love the unlovable, but what do I know just about every day I read that I'm going to hell.

Not that a warning of going to hell can't be given out of love, but I was thinking this very thing [bold text above] a few minutes ago. Good post.

You think the phrase "To whom much is given, much is required", could be applied to a holy, loving, Spirit?

[freeatlast]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Hey darlin'....I'd like to request ONE thing from you. Could you at least use the term "a few libs"? All this talk of "51%" and "most of the libs", etc. is really way off base.

What truly astonishes me is how is seems the "true holy ones" are the first ones that can't take the heat. Of all people, it seems that their complete understanding of being Christ-like should give them enough Holy Ghost unction to turn the other cheek and love the unlovable, but what do I know just about every day I read that I'm going to hell.

Yeah RC..what about the instruction in the word when you see your brother in a (percieved) fault, to GENTLY instruct him in the word.

[freeatlast]

Originally Posted by shamgar1

Wrong would imply that there is a right way to think about something. My liberty allows me to feel he said is what I think he said, because actually there are no absolutes.

So you see, you are not wrong to call me wrong, because that is your perspective. But I am not wrong to say Pragmatist is wrong because that is my perspective. I choose what is wrong - or right - as the case may be, based on how I feel at any given moment. That is my right as an individual.

You should allow me the option of being right or wrong, regardless of your personal feelings of my rightness or wrongness.

In that way, I am truly at my Christian liberty.

Good grief..where's Epley when ya need him to put one of his zingers on a person in need of a zinger.