You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Jason said NONE of those passages were fulfilled in 70AD? I doubt that show me?

Y'all want it so broad that y'all are free to roam from KNob hill to Hickory Bend without nailing down some parimeters.

Here ya go!!!! HERE

And this thread was created BECAUSE of what Jason FIRST said....

See, Bro. Epley, you can be wrong!! Still love you though!!

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

I thought you read my posts there? I thought you knew the agreed subject? If so, why are you asking me this?

"Follow"? Follow what? Hannnegraff, MacArthur, Zodhiates?? Where did he ever show ANYTHING that the apostles taught????

Bro. Epley, agreeing that I am right doesn't mean you agree with my view of prophecy. Truth is still truth....

Whooooooaaaaa, down, down I say!!!!

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Here ya go!!!! HERE

And this thread was created BECAUSE of what Jason FIRST said....

See, Bro. Epley, you can be wrong!! Still love you though!!

Jason clearly said SOME of those things happened in those days. Sorry.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

AND he mentioned the 70 weeks of Daniel???????????????

And he mentioneed what the apostles taught??????????????????????????

Also, it was about Daniel 9:24, NOT ABOUT Daniel's 70th Weeks.

Did you even read my post before attacking it? I mean, you doubted what Jason said, even though he DID say it, so you probably didn't comprehend my reasoning as I explained there either.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

And he mentioneed what the apostles taught??????????????????????????

Also, it was about Daniel 9:24, NOT ABOUT Daniel's 70th Weeks.

Did you even read my post before attacking it? I mean, you doubted what Jason said, even though he DID say it, so you probably didn't comprehend my reasoning as I explained there either.

He did NOT mention Daniels 70 weeks and he was in the lead and YOU was suppose to follow.
I was not speaking of Jason I was speaking of your debate with Andersen.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

He did NOT mention Daniels 70 weeks and he was in the lead and YOU was suppose to follow.
I was not speaking of Jason I was speaking of your debate with Andersen.

Thanks, I realized what you refering to.

Nope he didn't mention Daniel's 70 Weeks, and he also did not mention what the apostles taught either. However, I also know that YOU know Daniel 9:24 is a key to both our differences on eschatology. Its six points are all key doctrines of the apostles concerning Jesus...and THAT is what we were to discuss. I already explained that in my response, didn't you read it?

Bro. Epley, please don't play games. You didn't want him to go there because you know what it would mean if he explained those points are yet unfulfilled. I explained that in my response as well. That verse is exatly what we were to discuss, for, AS I SAID, it contains what the apostles taught about Jesus.

Good thing for you that Bro. Anderson quit before admitting he believed Jesus failed to complete those six points.... You do still believe those six points are unfulfilled, don't you??

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Thanks, I realized what you refering to.

Nope he didn't mention Daniel 70 Weeks, and he also did not mention what the apostles taught either. However, I also know that YOU know Daniel 9:24 is a key to both our differences on eschatology. Its six points are all key doctrines of the apostles concerning Jesus...and THAT is what we were to discuss. I alread explained that in my response, didn't you read it?

Bro. Epley, please don't play games. You didn't want him to go there because you know what it would mean if he explained those points are yet unfulfilled. I explained that in my respnse as well. That verse is exatly what we were to discuss, for, AS I SAID, it contains what the apostles taught about Jesus.

Good thing for you that Bro. Anderson quit before admitting he believed Jesus failed to complete those six points.... You do still believe those six points are unfulfilled, don't you??

Again Elder Burk you are incorrect the majority of post-trib guys I have met believe the 70 weeks have been fulfilled but believe in a LITERAL FUTURE return of Christ. You did NOT have the liberty to introduce the subject you was in the rebuttal and he was in the affirmative however you could have followed where in led in his question about the duration of the Lord's supper.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Again Elder Burk you are incorrect the majority of post-trib guys I have met believe the 70 weeks have been fulfilled but believe in a LITERAL FUTURE return of Christ. You did NOT have the liberty to introduce the subject you was in the rebuttal and he was in the affirmative however you could have followed where in led in his question about the duration of the Lord's supper.

AGAIN, what I said in my response was NOT ABOUT THE 70 WEEKS, but was about the six points in Daniel 9:24. Anyone on AFF can go there and read what I said as it is a permanent record. Therefore, please quit misrepresenting me.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

AGAIN, what I said in my response was NOT ABOUT THE 70 WEEKS, but was about the six points in Daniel 9:24. Anyone on AFF can go there and read what I said as it is a permanent record. Therefore, please quit misrepresenting me.

Again the record will show he did NOT mention that point!!!!!! YOU had NO right to bring it up. You CANNOT disconnect the 6 points with the rest of the prophecy.

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

AGAIN, what I said in my response was NOT ABOUT THE 70 WEEKS, but was about the six points in Daniel 9:24. Anyone on AFF can go there and read what I said as it is a permanent record. Therefore, please quit misrepresenting me.

Are you kidding? There wouldn't be any fun if we couldn't misrepresent you. LOL!