You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

There was NO clear proposition to me and I read the discussion. I am NOT blaming YOU nor HIM but a clear proposition should be affirmed and denied.
You guys need to agree on that then POST the proposition then by rules of debate he must define his proposition.
So rather than y'all yang yang why not just go back and do it correctly.
Have you read or heard any formal public debates? I suggest Hicks-or such like.
The proposition was always defined, then rebutted.
Both of you guys are brilliant men so quit this spitting contest and just start over and do it right.

Jason has understood.

Thanks for the suggestion.

I also understood. I wanted to point out that I did answer questions asked, which you deny.

The one thing we agree on is our wish the debate had continued in a correct manner.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

You've got THAT right!!

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Let it further be resolved that I have continuly challenged YOU to prove that Matthew 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13 to be future. In doing that you would of been able to clearly prove your position and disprove mine. You have run faster than a rabbit trying to evade the hounds. Now I am asking you to debate me on these chapters. No fake debate. I will send my request to Praxeas.


I affirm that Matthew 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13 are past and all fulfilled in 70 A.D.

Signed Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

[Evang.Benincasa]

Jason I sent Praxeas my PM.

You will prove that Matthew 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13 is future

I will show where those three chapters are past fulfilled.

You want to continue on other topics after YOU complete those, then fine with me.

I have constantly challenged you over and over again, even to the point of making an entire thread dedicated to you on the subject.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=23087

the above shows where I first challenged Jason to answer my questions.

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Thanks for the suggestion.

I also understood. I wanted to point out that I did answer questions asked, which you seem to deny.

The one thing we agree on is our wish the debate had continued in a correct manner.

Elder Burk would you kindly point out where Elder Andersen made any reference to the 70 weeks of Daniel? You were suppose to follow not lead.Then when you affirmed you could bring out whatever.

And NO you did NOT answer his question concerning the Lord's supper.

Maybe y'all can agree and restart again both of you are are indeed brilliant I commend you both for your scholarship. This would be a good discussion and profitable if y'all could agree to a proper format. I only replied because you asked NOT to fuss the subject.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Jason I sent Praxeas my PM.

You will prove that Matthew 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13 is future

I will show where those three chapters are past fulfilled.

You want to continue on other topics after YOU complete those, then fine with me.

I have constantly challenged you over and over again, even to the point of making an entire thread dedicated to you on the subject.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=23087

the above shows where I first challenged Jason to answer my questions.

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

I do NOT know of ONE futurist that would sign that proposition BECAUSE it is NOT correct. ALL Futurists that I know believe those chapters include the destruction of the temple in 70AD but are not LIMITED to that lone event.
A red herring my good friend.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I do NOT know of ONE futurist that would sign that proposition BECAUSE it is NOT correct. ALL Futurists that I know believe those chapters include the destruction of the temple in 70AD but are not LIMITED to that lone event.
A red herring my good friend.

What must be remembered is that Jason is the one who first alleged this. Also, Bro. Benincasa is not the only one who has asked Jason to support his claim. Futurists also asked him. Maybe now he will?

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Elder Burk would you kindly point out where Elder Andersen made any reference to the 70 weeks of Daniel? You were suppose to follow not lead.Then when you affirmed you could bring out whatever.

And NO you did NOT answer his question concerning the Lord's supper.

Maybe y'all can agree and restart again both of you are are indeed brilliant I commend you both for your scholarship. This would be a good discussion and profitable if y'all could agree to a proper format. I only replied because you asked NOT to fuss the subject.

I thought you read my posts there? I thought you knew the agreed subject? If so, why are you asking me this?

"Follow"? Follow what? Hannnegraff, MacArthur, Zodhiates?? Where did he ever show ANYTHING that the apostles taught????

Bro. Epley, agreeing that I am right doesn't mean you agree with my view of prophecy. Truth is still truth....

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

What must be remembered is that Jason is the one who first alleged this. Also, Bro. Benincasa is not the only one who has asked Jason to support his claim. Futurists also asked him. Maybe now he will?

Jason said NONE of those passages were fulfilled in 70AD? I doubt that show me?

Y'all want it so broad that y'all are free to roam from KNob hill to Hickory Bend without nailing down some parimeters.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

I thought you read my posts there? I thought you knew the agreed subject? If so, why are you asking me this?

"Follow"? Follow what? Hannnegraff, MacArthur, Zodhiates?? Where did he ever show ANYTHING that the apostles taught????

Bro. Epley, agreeing that I am right doesn't mean you agree with my view of prophecy. Truth is still truth....

AND he mentioned the 70 weeks of Daniel???????????????