You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk - Page 20

BrotherEastman · #**191** 03-26-2009, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

This is not ignorance it is a calculated false teaching that destroys the hope of the saints.

So, Preterists don't have any hope? Why teach and preach Acts if they don't? I'm not sure I get it yet.

BrotherEastman · #**192** 03-26-2009, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford

For the record, from my understanding, if Bro. Anderson did not define what his premise was then you had the right to ask him to do so. You did not have the right to interject a different passage altogether and broach another subject altogether. That is only allowed when you are in the affirmative and he is the responder.

It seems to me that you are wanting to justify your error because of Bro. Anderson's supposed error. That dog won't hunt. Sorry.

That dog won't hunt? That there is funny.

JN Anderson · #**193** 03-26-2009, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

Another Christ? What do you mean? (I honestly thought Apostolics ((whether preterists or futurist)) believed in Acts 2:38?) Aren't Brother Burk and Brother Benicasa Apostolics?

Reread what you posted here. Another Christ and not believing Acts 2:38. I am not saying they do NOT believe in Acts 2:38. Many folks do and embrace it, while many run from what they truly know it means. FP effects the most fundamental aspect of salvation, i.e. faith in the Son of God. FP is saying that we need not be Apostolic in some sense. The Apostles and Disciples of Christ all died with an expectation that the Son of God would return. The youngest Disciple, John the beloved, wrote with a sudden expectancy of Christ's return in AD 96. No doubt He died expecting the return of Jesus Christ. FP says there is now no hope or expectancy. That is a different Christ that John believed in and I would agree. Futurism is completely Biblical. STILL.

onlygrace · #**194** 03-26-2009, 03:07 PM

Mmm. I see the witchhunt continues. Some things never change.

rrford · #**195** 03-26-2009, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlygrace

Mmm. I see the witchhunt continues. Some things never change.

Tue enough, huh? I remember it all started with those off-the-wall Epistle writers denouncing heresy. Man, if only they had not started such a practice.

BrotherEastman · #**196** 03-26-2009, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JN Anderson

Reread what you posted here. Another Christ and not believing Acts 2:38. I am not saying they do NOT believe in Acts 2:38. Many folks do and embrace it, while many run from what they truly know it means. FP effects the most fundamental aspect of salvation, i.e. faith in the Son of God. FP is saying that we need not be Apostolic in some sense. The Apostles and Disciples of Christ all died with an expectation that the Son of God would return. The youngest Disciple, John the beloved, wrote with a sudden expectancy of Christ's return in AD 96. No doubt He died expecting the return of Jesus Christ. FP says there is now no hope or expectancy. That is a different Christ that John believed in and I would agree. Futurism is completely Biblical. STILL.

Btw, I visited your blog. You have a fine looking family Brother Anderson.

BrotherEastman · #**197** 03-26-2009, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlygrace

Mmm. I see the witchhunt continues. Some things never change.

Who? The futurists or the preterists?

JN Anderson · #**198** 03-26-2009, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

Btw, I visited your blog. You have a fine looking family Brother Anderson.

Yes! I am a blessed man! Thanks for visiting my blog. I update it only a couple times or more a month.

Steve Epley · #**199** 03-26-2009, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford

For the record, from my understanding, if Bro. Anderson did not define what his premise was then you had the right to ask him to do so. You did not have the right to interject a different passage altogether and broach another subject altogether. That is only allowed when you are in the affirmative and he is the responder.

It seems to me that you are wanting to justify your error because of Bro. Anderson's supposed error. That dog won't hunt. Sorry.

The problem is they do not understand polemic discussions they just think they can just talk anything in their rebuttals. The he felt slighted because the affirmative speaker did not deal with the arguments he had no right to introduce.

Steve Epley · #**200** 03-26-2009, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JN Anderson

Reread what you posted here. Another Christ and not believing Acts 2:38. I am not saying they do NOT believe in Acts 2:38. Many folks do and embrace it, while many run from what they truly know it means. FP effects the most fundamental aspect of salvation, i.e. faith in the Son of God. FP is saying that we need not be Apostolic in some sense. The Apostles and Disciples of Christ all died with an expectation that the Son of God would return. The youngest Disciple, John the beloved, wrote with a sudden expectancy of Christ's return in AD 96. No doubt He died expecting the return of Jesus Christ. FP says there is now no hope or expectancy. That is a different Christ that John believed in and I would agree. Futurism is completely Biblical. STILL.

True.