10.01.09-The End of Haneywood - D. Bernard New GS

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

First I agree with Baron and now you? Wow. Crazy day.

You like me, you can't help it!

[John Atkinson]

Originally Posted by Kim Komando

Mooney to start new site www.wedecline.org

[Elizabeth]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

He should have withdrawn BEFORE the vote - not after.

Exactly-

[MrMasterMind]

Originally Posted by MrMasterMind

Miss B, I believe the concern is also as the frontrunner people thinking he was available MAY have affected the ballot NOT giving GS Haney the 2/3 majority he needed to run again.

BUMP

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by John Atkinson

Yeah, they probably are from the AMF perspective.

As a disinterested observer Mooney or Bernard would be best, though I think DB might be the better choice...

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by Melody

oh excuse me Bro Haney, could I have the floor before the nominating vote.....

Brethren, just in case you were going to nominate me, I don't wish for the position,

there is no way that gentleman would have done, that,

After the nomination. And the weeks leading up to the vote.

[Scott Hutchinson]

You know Lawyers are always suspicious.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by Kim Komando

Mooney to start new site www.wedecline.org

[bishoph]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

No, they had three nominees - - they voted on those three.

Once he was nominated, he should have withdrawn.

Correction.....that is precisely what he did.......he withdrew AFTER nomination and BEFORE being voted on.

Nomination is by written ballot.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by bishoph

Correction.....that is precisely what he did.......he withdrew AFTER nomination and BEFORE being voted on.

Nomination is by written ballot.

Okay - thanks!