Alternate Apostolic Distinctions! - Page 2

rgcraig · #11 10-05-2009, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

What's to understand? It is showy.

Some are very classy, but I have seen outlandish before too.

One night this week someone singing on the platform had a silk flower on their shoulder the size of a dinner plate. Might have been a bit overstated, but to each their own. I just have never understood how that's okay, but a necklace (much smaller in size) is not.

RandyWayne · #12 10-05-2009, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Wright

There were some outlandish costumes this year at GC.

A few zoot suits with matching shoes and a sister had on a clown looking outfit.

The hairstyles were good for the most part. However the big rolls on top of their foreheads looked ridiculous.

If I did not understand our ways it would look showy.

I perfer modest moderate dressing.

It would have been hilarious if you walked by a group who looked like this -and proceeded to put a handful of candy in each of their pockets while saying "Ooohhhhh! Your scarrrryyyy!".

rgcraig · #13 10-05-2009, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

It would have been hilarious if you walked by a group who looked like this -and proceeded to put a handful of candy in each of their pockets while saying "Ooohhhhh! Your scarrrryyyy!".

LOL...you are bad!!!!!

Margies3 · #14 10-05-2009, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Some are very classy, but I have seen outlandish before too.

One night this week someone singing on the platform had a silk flower on their shoulder the size of a dinner plate. Might have been a bit overstated, but to each their own. I just have never understood how that's okay, but a necklace (much smaller in size) is not.

Well, see, the difference is that that dinner plate on someone's shoulder would never draw attention down to their chest. While a simple necklace - that's another story. Remember how my pastor told me that the problem with necklaces was that it drew a man's eyes away from a woman's face straight down to her chest?

Yep, a dinner plate on her shoulder would never do that.

rgcraig · #15 10-05-2009, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margies3

Well, see, the difference is that that dinner plate on someone's shoulder would never draw attention down to their chest. While a simple necklace - that's another story. Remember how my pastor told me that the problem with necklaces was that it drew a man's eyes away from a woman's face straight down to her chest?

Yep, a dinner plate on her shoulder would never do that.

What was his reasoning for not wearing earrings?

KWSS1976 · #16 10-05-2009, 03:05 PM

So you would not be drawn to ear wax that one is easy....

Esther · #17 10-05-2009, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margies3

Well, see, the difference is that that dinner plate on someone's shoulder would never draw attention down to their chest. While a simple necklace - that's another story. Remember how my pastor told me that the problem with necklaces was that it drew a man's eyes away from a woman's face straight down to her chest?

Yep, a dinner plate on her shoulder would never do that.

Lordy, I hope you didn't mention his tie.

Margies3 · #18 10-05-2009, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther

Lordy, I hope you didn't mention his tie.

uhh, noooo, but I did mention his very showy belt buckle.

SOUNWORTHY · #19 10-05-2009, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margies3

uhh, noooo, but I did mention his very showy belt buckle.

Then you did notice my Texas size belt buckle. I was afraid no one would notice.

I did notice one guy with a beard, now that's pushing it.

SOUNWORTHY · #20 10-05-2009, 03:31 PM

Some went to GC to be blessed, some were there out of curiosity while others to criticize and find something to complain about. for you who were there in which category were you? I was there for the first two. I was both blessed and had my curiosity satisfied. This was my second GC. The other one was a long time ago.