Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
They didn't claim false light...false light generally requires actual malice and is intended to harm someone emotionally rather than damage their reputation.
|
In THIS case they did not, in answering general questions it should be pointed out in some jurisdictions it is possible.
There is no doubt he had malice, and the point being it does not always require an overt lie to be successfully sued. :-)
Threaded Mode
