Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffro
Sherri, if you're still on board with asinine supposed discussion, I would like to ask if you can explain the dual-nature of Christ from your point of view? I don't know that I could add anything to what the other posters have already shown, but perhaps if we could see it as you view it, it would help us understand what you can't or don't see. I don't know how long you've been studying the Godhead, but keep in mind that Jesus told Peter that he wasn't smart enough to figure it out himself, but that God had shown it to him. I'm not trying to criticize you in any way and please don't take it that way, but this thing is so awesome that many believe that when Jesus was talking to Peter in Matthew, He meant that His church would be built not on who He was, but the Revelation of who He was.
|
Well, actually Peter didn't deliver a theology of the "dual nature of God." He just said, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the Living God."
I think it's disturbing when we say that others just haven't been privileged enough to have that revelation to understand the godhead the same way we do.
I think the revelation that Peter experienced, was Gospel-centered faith. It's regeneration. I think it's what happens when one believes.