So are you all saying Keith no longer accepts that
Acts 2:38 message is the fulfillment of the new birth? It was not long ago he was rejoicing in the teaching of David Pawson and his book "The Normal Christian Birth". He teaches similar to Oneness Pentecostals about it.
As far as the man made standards of the UPC I certainly can understand rejecting them. I personally left the mainline Apostolic Churches in the early 80's because of the extra biblical teachings. That does not mean we should forsake the truth of the new birth.
Threaded Mode
