The Apostolic New Testament soon to be published!

[Arphaxad]

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

I personally don't believe Matt 28:19 is original. Humans by nature tend to hang with similar phrasing. nowhere is anything like Matt 28:19 remotely used anywhere in scripture except at the end of Matt. Mark nor Luke allude to such language nor do the Apostles use such language a pronouncing of authority. Some ask what proof do you have? Well besides some references that many know about by later figures to Matt 28:19 to be "in my name" I have nothing from a textual evidence. Internal evidence is very strong against it as many have pointed out. Also we don't have the originals and the ones we do have are after church and state unification. So if evidence was destroyed of the original for the later rendering what can you say if that is your only criteria. Can't have that as we MUST have canon or it's all a lie nothing can be trusted blah blah blah.

Why didn't they change Acts 2:38 too?