Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist
Oh so now it's OK for YOU to bring up callings, anointings, functions, etc., but not me?
|
Not in the sense you did. The callings, anointings, functions, is a separate issue than the fact that the Holy Ghost indwells Jesus and Stephen and us. You, as well as anyone else, still hasn't identified that which dwells in Jesus which results in the fullness of the Godhead and that which dwells in us which doesn't result in the fullness of the Godhead.
The Holy Ghost indwells both us and Jesus, as I've pointed out over and over and over and over and over, but there seems to be something not indwelling us which indwelled Jesus. You, nor has anyone else, identified that which we lack.
Quote:
So then, by your own admission, Jesus could ,as a man, be filled with an anointing of the Spirit, and yet still be the embodiment of that Spirit in flesh.
Jesus' "anointing" is to be the Spirit in bodily form, and the place through which that deity is expressed and rule takes place. You will never see any other visible expression of God than what you see in the Son. Get used to it.
|
And the same Holy Ghost which indwelled Jesus indwelled Stephen and indwelled those on the day of Pentecost and indwells those who are filled with the Spirit of God, including trinitarians.
Jesus wasn't the Holy Ghost, Jesus was filled with the Holy Ghost and led by the Holy Ghost, per scripture.
You're not, nor will anyone else, going to reveal that which indwelled Jesus which doesn't indwell us. I know that, you know that.