Is baptism part of the new birth?

[navygoat1998]

Originally Posted by bishoph

I agree....when people do not believe in the necessity of baptism, they do not give the blood of Christ enough credit! How ya like that? Just joking/kind of.

Biblically can you point to where the blood is applied/washes away sin outside of baptism? Acts 2:38 says baptism is for the remission of sins. I know some here will argue that the "for" is "because" sins have been forgiven/washed away. However, Elder Epley posted a copy of responses from something like 20+ Greek Scholars/professors from places like Harvard and other well respected institutions of higher learning who without exception stated that the context of Acts 2:38 was "to receive remission/forgiveness" not because of. (This was in response to a letter sent to each one asking them to give their opinion on the grammatical construct and subsequent meaning.)

I have a copy of it on my other computer, and if Elder Epley doesn't beat me to it I will post it.

Paul was told to arise and be baptized wash away your sins calling on the name of the Lord. (Paul's personal testimony Acts 22:16)

Why would the Apostles command baptism if it was optional? A commandment is not a suggestion, it is a requirement.

Just some thoughts from the peanut gallery

Bishop to be honest, I don't know that I don't believe that Baptism is just an option. I think it is the total part of salvation, I don't think that you can separate Baptism from Salvation. Does that make sense?