Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
They don't get dealt with because nobody reports them or not enough are reporting them.
That's my answer.
It's also not a comparison either because you are comparing views on things that are not personalized compared to talking about the UPC and those that believe or are still IN the UPC.
We don't read every post...you guys have to report this stuff
|
Why would there have to be lots of people reporting them if the posting does not fall within the written guidelines? Just one report should do it I would think.
It is most certainly a comparison. Sharing that one's faith is essentially nothing is not personal? Telling them that they cannot trust things in the Bible isn't personal? Challenging someone to pray and heal a person while video taping it for all to see is not personal? I could go on and on.
Naming an organization in a post, while not naming anyone in the organization, is not personal. Not unless something is stated to the effect of, "Everyone in that group is (some negative remark)."
I believe that if I pounded some other discussion that was anti-Bible/faith in the same manner as was repeatedly done on ILG's discussion, I'd probably be reprimanded, maybe banned.
I DO get your frustration if there are a bunch of "anti" UPC discussions. Perhaps the board rules are due for a change?