Quote:
Originally Posted by Disciple4life
After reading Dr. Fudges second book I have had time to reflect.
After reading the second book it is easy to understand WHY he wrote the first book!
I think Fudge understood/learned/heard that people took his first book as hateful (that is not how I took it but it was some people's opinions at the time). In the second book he was more diplomatic.
At no point did I feel like Fudge was trying to convert me. He was telling a story, which has excellent footnotes by the way. I do not think Fudge was misleading. He says over and over that there was controversy and TWO different opinions. Fudge goes on numerous times to restate both sides of the debate. Do I have a good idea of what Dr Fudge thinks concerning the UPCI? Sure, but to say the book was one sided is a stretch.
|
"Christianity Without The Cross?" and anyone wonders if it is a hit piece?
Threaded Mode
