Apostolic But Not Believing Jesus is The Father?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by mfblume

But you are missing our point that you made a sweeping statement saying we were showing the bible does not mean what it says, and the bible includes words like the man talking to his own soul, using the very personal pronouns you demand were proof of multi-personal interaction. Our point is that the Bible uses this language in reference to Father and Son and does not necessarily demand we think in multi-personal terms. Just as the man talking to his own soul is not a picture of two persons, yet uses the language of multipersons, the interaction between Father and Son uses those terms but DOES NOT IMPLY MULTiIPERSONS either, but something else.

The "something else" is not the same condition as the man talking to his own soul, but apart from that, but still not multi-persons as you insist.

We''re showing you that the BIBLE USES that language and it cannot be used as proof for more than one person.

You don't believe that a man speaking to his own soul is a use of metaphor?