Did we get the Swaggart scandal wrong? (V)

[shazeep]

if the accusations are baseless, then they should not be hard to refute, right? You guys realize the distinct comparison that can be made here to blaming the Russkies or whomever, anyone, rather than examining the emails and proceeding according to your own law? Houston, do i need to quote some Scripture to convince you or something? Is accusation manifesting humility here, or defensiveness? How do OPs examine themselves? Oh, snap, the same way Corporations do, huh.

you can either get defensive at restatements, or see that they are invitations to rebuttal. I'm not trying to put words in anyone's mouth; if one of my restatements is inaccurate then by all means point out how. I understand that they are likely just what i heard, not what you meant.

you have an open invitation to return to where your arguments were misunderstood, and i don't see anyone picking up that mantle. Are you saying you want to actually support some of your so far pointless rhetoric, Dordt, or what? Would you like me to support this charge, with a quote maybe, or do you just want to rest in "i am the victim here, and God will surely vindicate me?" You got an example of where i put words in your mouth?

Because i don't believe you, and i don't believe you even believe you.