Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
I agree with you. However, since these people are convinced that bifurcated garments are an "abomination" based on Deuteronomy 22:5... it can't be circumstantial or a matter of conviction. It would be an abomination to wear bifurcated garments regardless as to if they are worn in public or private. This is yet another example of how misapplying Deuteronomy 22:5 spills over into condemning things it was never designed to condemn unless it is exegeted accurately.
If they argue that bifurcated garments are an "abomination" based on Deuteronomy 22:5, they have to condemn any bedroom attire and pajamas that are bifurcated. They can't say that an "abomination" is okay as long as it is worn in private. lol |
They have to condemn what people wear to bed?????
They can't say that an "abomination" is okay as long as it is worn in private??????
I have never in my life heard of a preacher preach on lingerie in bed. Pants are pants I agree, but I think I will let people deal with this one without my help.
Threaded Mode
