Quote:
Originally Posted by tv1a
If your assessment is valid, than there should be no problem with a new set of landmarks. The landmarks established 50 years ago are not in the same place as the landmarks established in the Bible.
Landmarks are principles not rules. The guidelines established 50 years ago are rules.
|
I agree to an extent. But consider that when defining landmarks for today, it is just as important to "consider" the landmarks of recent years, as well as the lanmarks of 3500 years ago. It is only prudent for us to consider and take into account the reasoning behind our immediate predecessor's conclusions and integrate them in a way that is relevant and biblical today! Simply casting off the "landmarks" of our immediate predecessors is, IMO, unwise.
Threaded Mode
